UNLESS radical elements on the two sides sabotage it, the call for a ceasefire between Turkish security forces and Kurdish militants has the potential to resolve a 30-year conflict which has claimed nearly 40,000 lives. Reacting to Kurdish leader Abdullah Ocalan’s call to Iraq-based Kurdish guerrillas on Thursday to end violence and vacate Turkish territory, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan promised his security forces would not undertake any military operations in the insurgency-infested southeast. Mr Ocalan, who heads the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), said it was time weapons fell silent and “ideas and politics” spoke out. The massive size of the cheering Diyarbakir crowd, on Nauroz, listening to Mr Ocalan’s speech, read out by a pro-Kurdish MP, testified to his hold over the Kurdish people despite 14 years in a Turkish prison. The leader of the PKK’s armed wing, Murat Karayilan, said he “strongly supported” Mr Ocalan’s ceasefire call. The telecast of the speech over Turkish TV channels itself constituted a major shift in Ankara’s policy.

Both Mr Erdogan and Mr Ocalan have staked their political future on the peace moves, which began several years ago when Turkish intelligence officials met the PKK leader at the Imrali prison. The two face threats from certain elements, with Turkish ultra-nationalists accusing Mr Erdogan of “treason”. For Turks raised in the old Kemalist tradition, the very word “Kurd” is anathema. In fact, until Mr Erdogan’s Justice and Development Party effected reforms under pressure from the European Union, the Kurds had no cultural rights. The reforms allowed Kurdish radio and TV channels to function. Three decades of violence have drained Turkish resources. Mr Erdogan once asked his party men to consider where Turkey would be if there were no Kurdish insurgency. He faces stiff opposition, because he plans changes in the constitution and intends to incorporate Kurdish rights in it. It would be a historic achievement, indeed, if Mr Erdogan manages to push through the reforms and achieve a durable peace agreement with the marginalised Kurds.

Updated Mar 23, 2013 01:06am

More From This Section

ISI and media infighting

IN the bizarre, whiplash-inducing fallout of the Hamid Mir shooting, an alarming new twist has occurred: the ...

MQM in government again

THE MQM’s decision to join the Sindh government is not altogether surprising. The love-hate relationship that it...

Men planning families

AFTER decades of witnessing the country struggle to bring its burgeoning population figures under control, with ...

Militant groups in Punjab

THE Punjab government, in response to a report in this newspaper, has furnished statistics pertaining to the last ...

Comments (1) (Closed)


xhizer
Mar 23, 2013 05:53pm
Why is it that Kurds have no rights? They number more than Palestinians. If Palestinians can have rights to their own homeland (and I will add that I FULLY support that right) then why not Kurds? Why are ALL Islamic governments two-faced hypocrites? They support Palestine because it is politically expedient. They will NOT support Kurdish rights ( they too should have their own Independent country) simply because all Kurds live in Islamic countries, and God forbid any "sacred land" of theirs can be divided! India was divided in 1947. Why can't Kurds have their rights? Will anyone give a logical answer, not based on emotion? I challenge the moderator to let this comment stand. I doubt he will.