Complex strategies

Published Jan 05, 2013 03:07am

MAULVI Nazir is no more, the good/bad Taliban wiped out by an American drone in South Waziristan. The reason for targeting him is obvious: Nazir and his fighters focused their attention on the fight in Afghanistan against the government there and the foreign troops. For the army-led security establishment, Nazir’s death is a blow — the dead militant was one of the key players in the state’s strategy of securing the restraint of some militants when it came to attacking the Pakistani state. Softening the blow, from the army’s perspective at least, is that Nazir’s purported successor, Bawal Khan, is also seen as one of the ‘good Taliban’, a young fighter whose attention is drawn towards the fight in Afghanistan and who is not particularly sympathetic to the TTP. If all of this can seem bewildering, it is. The very idea of good Taliban is rooted in a flawed, defensive approach to the fight against militancy: fighting all militants at the same time is beyond the state’s capacity; the policy towards Afghanistan is to rely on jihadi proxies to keep Pakistan’s role influential; ergo, not all Taliban need to be defeated or even organisationally degraded. The argument that the fight to reclaim South Waziristan at least isn’t as tough as it could be had Maulvi Nazir and his fighters joined the Mehsuds fighting the Pakistani state is also deeply flawed. ‘At least it isn’t as bad as it could be’ is really just another way of the state saying that it doesn’t have the resolve or capacity to impose its will on groups whose explicit goal is to establish their own writ over Pakistani territory. The argument is not just a slippery slope, it is effectively giving up on the idea of the modern state, a peculiar concession for a country as heavily militarised and security oriented as Pakistan.

The killing of Maulvi Nazir also underlines the deep and continuing differences between Pakistan and the US, a reality that recent developments had suggested may be narrowing. The strong reaction in private by security officials here suggests that they were not involved in the decision to take out Nazir, a decision that will once again sharpen suspicions on both sides that for all the talk of closer cooperation in the so-called Afghan endgame, the US and Pakistan still have fundamentally different goals and interests. The tragedy is that Nazir’s killing can exacerbate problems for both countries, triggering revenge attacks inside Afghanistan against the US and perhaps renewing debate in the next tier of leadership in Nazir’s group that a harder line against the Pakistani state is also necessary.

More From This Section

The regional challenge

Meetings between senior officials and their Afghan and American counterparts have underlined concern of Pakistan.

Karachi operation

There are differences between the federal and provincial governments over the campaign’s ownership: HRCP

Without the leaders

For many, the leadership’s personal tours abroad signify a kind of retreat

Comments (8) (Closed)


Arshad
Jan 05, 2013 05:50am
A good analysis. If Pakistan is promoting "good Talibans" to destroy others, we can't save us from destruction.
ChangaManga
Jan 05, 2013 07:17am
Editorial idea of Pakistan fighting all Taliban groups no matter what is naive. Even America has friended people whom it despised in the past and killed those who were friended in the past.
Faqi
Jan 05, 2013 08:34am
Nation is paying for some exceptionally bad decisions made by our so-called "custodians".
mazharuddin
Jan 05, 2013 12:13pm
Killing of human beings by drone or by air fire is unjust, Army should combat against terrorists in the battlefield and bring culprits to justice. This is a crime to kill people without trial, what type of army is not to pursue criminals on ground, should have courage and need to avoid killing innocent people by air power. All such activities create hatred as this barbaric and show of power.
Dr Khan
Jan 05, 2013 04:31pm
America is thousand miles away from Pakistan and will not be affected by talibanisation. We have to live here. Are you ready to live with these devils? Forget America, think of yourself.
Kamal Hussain
Jan 05, 2013 05:18pm
If there are 'good' and 'bad' Taliban for Pakistan, one must assume there are 'good' and 'bad' Taliban for the United States.
Akai
Jan 05, 2013 05:26pm
It is amazing that there are some who do not see the writing on the wall: AfghanTalibans and Pakistani Talibans have a common aim -- to capture power in the name of Islam, and play havoc with whoever shows the slightest sign of resistance.
Sohrab
Jan 06, 2013 03:27am
Dude wake up before you find them at your doorstep unless you agree with their philosophy and is OK for your women to be locked up, not get a decent education and you kids not to be vaccinated....and for any disagreements in a debate, your family to be blown up in smitherens. If you want otherwise for your own kith and kin, then just shut up....I hope I do not sound politically right.