PAKISTAN’S political leaders, as a class, profess commitment to the parliamentary system but, in practice, violate every principle on which it rests. Plainly put, they tend to owe allegiance not to institutions but to men. That has been the history and is also the present position.

In a parliamentary government the president symbolises the authority of the state but it is exercised by the prime minister; the majority party in the parliament makes laws but they are uniformly administrated by neutral civil servants; and disputes arising are adjudicated by independent judges.

Legislators have no role in the enforcement of laws, just as civil servants and judges have none in making them. Only the Supreme Court can strike down a law if it is found to negate the constitution. The politics beginning at the polls must end in the assemblies. And the constitutional head of the state, or province, must stand above political squabbles. Civil servants and judges must have no political preferences, much less affiliation, and, ideally, should be averse to politics.

Just as these principles are a matter of common knowledge, so also is their violation. The president leads the ruling party and is the fountainhead of all executive authority. Not the people of Pakistan alone, even the world sees him in that light.

Further, the governor of Sindh fully shares the executive authority of the chief minister. In Punjab, he cuts a pathetic figure. If Pakistan is to be administrated as envisaged in the constitution, Asif Ali Zardari and Yousuf Raza Gilani shall have to swap positions and the provincial governors shall have to act alike.

Down the ladder, most legislators feel persuaded to dabble in administration because there are no elected representatives at levels below the capital cities. Islamabad may be far away from Gwadar, but Quetta is no nearer.

Elected councils from the village upward can fill the wide gap but, ironically, it is the ministers and legislators who would rather deal with the unprotected and increasingly subservient officials rather than with people’s representatives.

The stress and abuse that currently plague public life would abate to a great extent if institutions, and the men who run them, were to conform to the provisions of the constitution.

All elected councillors and career officials working together in districts and villages can create conditions conducive to public peace and welfare. Both will have common interest in resisting interference by senior ministers or bureaucrats.

In the structure of power and responsibility as it stands today, it will be hard to determine who, at any level, is to be held accountable for the death and destruction wrought in Karachi on May 22. If culpability is found at the top, then who should go — the governor or the chief minister?


Do you have information you wish to share with You can email our News Desk to share news tips, reports and general feedback. You can also email the Blog Desk if you have an opinion or narrative to share, or reach out to the Special Projects Desk to send us your Photos, or Videos.

More From This Section

Terrorism: car number plates

FIFTEEN years ago, the government conducted a major research on car registration. They found out that to stop ...

Sit-ins: another view

THIS refers to the letter ‘Are sit-ins democratic?’ (Jan 29). Prof Sharif Al Mujahid has made a strong case that...

GB: recruitment

CORRUPTION in any form ruins the very roots of any institution. But corruption in the education sector destroys...

Comments (4) Closed

Jun 12, 2012 08:08pm
Democracy has not failed in India. It is thriving there. It has not failed in Pakistan either. It is evolving there.
Muhammad Ashraf
Jun 12, 2012 11:31am
My observation is that Democracy as a system of governance has failed in Pakistan and elsewhere like India, but the people and inteelgentia do not have the courage to admit it. My suggestion : Let us try some other System. Let us show courage and admit our failure so that we as anation do not sufer more.
Jun 12, 2012 04:22pm
In a speech in the House of Commons on 11 November 1947, Winston Churchill said: No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.
Baba Sidni
Jun 12, 2012 11:44pm
When a car or any other appliance repeatedly breaks down, if one has money, one would try to buy a new one, otherwise, would be forced to use the same thing with a few patches. Pakistan, as an entity, cannot afford to change the system. We need to fix it, til it shows any life. I predict, it still got some mileage left in it. We would take out all the juice left in the system, before discarding it.