IN a fit of pique, our security establishment decided to punish Dr Shakil Afridi to make Pakistan look strong after the Osama bin Laden raid made it look weak. Never mind the embarrassment of Pakistan being painted internationally as a country that regards someone helping track down the world’s most wanted terrorist as deserving of years of punishment. But only in Pakistan can preposterousness be topped off with more of the same. According to documents accessed by this newspaper, it seems Dr Afridi was actually convicted by the Fata tribunal not for aiding the US intelligence apparatus in Pakistan, as was widely reported earlier, but for colluding with Mangal Bagh, leader of the Lashkar-i-Islam in Khyber Agency and a thorn in the side of the Pakistani state (though, like many militants in the tribal region, the history of his relationship with the state isn’t as straightforward as is now portrayed).

This abrupt change raises some difficult questions. First is the Pakistani government’s silence in the face of the reaction provoked by Dr Afridi’s sentencing. Not just was it condemned by some senior figures within the US government, the US Senate Appropriations Committee voted last week to cut aid to Pakistan by $33m — a million for each year of detention handed down to Dr Afridi, generally regarded in the US as a hero that helped bring down the world’s most wanted man. Given the shaky juncture at which Pak-US relations currently stand, it is curious that there was no denial from official quarters that Dr Afridi had in fact been convicted for links to a militant group. If the reason behind his conviction was different, why was this not clarified earlier? And if the charges included treason, as this government also indicated, why was he not tried in an open court under the regular laws of the land? There are, after all, numerous legal precedents of people being tried and convicted for providing information for recompense to a foreign government.

Yet another question is that, quite clearly, bin Laden — and numerous other known militants — lived and moved freely on Pakistani soil for several years. But despite the institution of an inquiry commission into the bin Laden matter, the only head to have rolled so far is that of Dr Afridi. Had the state been apprehending and convicting militants or those responsible for bin Laden’s undetected presence in the country, Dr Afridi would have little to complain about. But his case appears to be more the exception than the rule. Preposterousness heaped on preposterousness: it’s never a good way for any country to manage its affairs.

More From This Section

More than money needed

IF it weren’t for the history and the present context, it would have been a grand announcement. Balochistan, Prime...

Measuring poverty

POLITICALLY, poverty has been a sensitive issue in Pakistan, as it has been in many other developing countries. It ...

Lure of the blue passport

PASSPORT and visa issues continue to occupy our leaders. The latest evidence of this came on Friday when members of...

Yet another chance

WITH the government determined to have a dialogue with the TTP come what may, the rest of the stakeholders have...

Comments are closed.

Comments (43)

Cyrus Howell
May 31, 2012 8:07 am
Obama (and the Pentagon) are not likely to change their minds, and Mitt Romney is very unlikely to win the US presidency because American women like Obama's wife (and don't like Romney's wife Mrs. Barbie Doll).
May 31, 2012 6:57 am
It is tit for tat, nothing else.
Chuck Hastings
May 31, 2012 3:52 am
With allies like Pakistan, the United States doesn't need enemies.
May 31, 2012 4:30 am
So our army led security establishment still believes that they can get away with this sham trial and conviction. They should realise that the world has changed and now it is very difficult for them to negotiate with it. They should know that they can only befool ordinary Pakistanis by fomenting anti americanism but not the super power.
May 31, 2012 5:09 am
Pakistan is making it very difficult for the world to accept it in the comlty of nations.The sitiuation is deteriorating very fast. What if Obama changes his mind after the lections or if the republican Mit Rommney assumes office? The present Pakistani position is solely based on American withdrawl from Afganistan and a further assumpton that after that pakistan amy will gain control of Afgan proxies. What if any of these assumptions are wrong as has been in the past???
May 31, 2012 5:35 am
dont u feel funny being editor of a paper in pakistan where u hv to write a editorial like the above piece? phew... its so embarrassing to read and hear things about pakistan.
May 31, 2012 5:47 am
Why every so called liberal is worried about Dr. Afridi's sentence and propagating that it would tarnish our image abroad and we would lose all our credibility in the comity of nations. I think we would strengthen our position in the global world as there are not one but several examples of several countries where their nationals have been sentenced for upto 50 years for colluding with foreign countries our spy agencies. Why is Pakistan then exception. Such positions taken by various anchors and newspapers specially that like Dawn strengthens the suspicions that West is investing alot in our media to get their desired point of view being propagated to the world.
Jean Verlander
May 31, 2012 5:55 am
Some common sense at last on the Dr. Afridi case. Pakistan was made to look foolish allowing Bin Laden to live in their midst for years, how else can they SAVE FACE but to blame the Doctor. I thought we were all looking for BIn Laden, the Doc. on the whole did a good job. Please do not tell lies about why he is in Prison. It does not wash with the outside world, we can see through you Pakistan.
May 31, 2012 6:07 am
it seems Dr Afridi was actually convicted by the Fata tribunal not for aiding the US intelligence apparatus in Pakistan, as was widely reported earlier, but for colluding with Mangal Bagh, leader of the Lashkar-i-Islam in Khyber Agency says it all- the Pakistan perception of reality (if it is correct) victim and terrorist
May 31, 2012 6:25 am
Can't understand why Pakistan's actions so incongruent with international expectations. Being unable to know that BL lived in Pakistan is one thing but punishing a person who helped in nabbing him entirely diiferent. Former is at worst incompetence and the later is at best insensitive!
M.FAAIZ Gilgity
May 31, 2012 6:36 am
USA shouldnt make interference in pakistans internal affairs...if USA is such an advocate of international law then why dont USA releases pakistani citizen Aafia sidiqi...
May 31, 2012 6:57 am
Yes and it is true the other way round too!
May 31, 2012 7:17 am
Whoever has concocted this story deserves an Oscar.
May 31, 2012 7:19 am
With US as an ally no one needs an enemy
May 31, 2012 7:34 am
Musharaff had at that time itself publicly stated 'it is a tactical move' to support USA. Any layman could make out that from all his subsequent moves. Why Americans still accepted Pakistan is a mystery.
Cyrus Howell
May 31, 2012 8:01 am
When Pakistan heard the government was to lose $33 million, Dr Afridi was suddenly convicted by the Fata tribunal for colluding with Mangal Bagh, leader of the Lashkar-i-Islam. Pretty thin.
Cyrus Howell
May 31, 2012 8:13 am
What Pakistan has shown the whole world is that it cannot be trusted. Hope you are not missing that?
May 31, 2012 10:18 am
Beneath the diplomatic talks that are quoted across, most of the people out side Pakistan have a firm belief that Pakistani army hide Osama (belief is the word not skepticism) and knew that the ones to be punished will be the ones who helped nab Osama.
May 31, 2012 9:28 am
instead of calling media traitors, make a point in your argument.
May 31, 2012 10:22 am
Moin, if Dr.Afridi had sold Pakistan's military secrets to India, the punishment is understandable. He only helped nab an international terrorist! How is that treason? Besides, Pakistan is supposed to be NATO's ally, not foe!
May 31, 2012 12:33 pm
A timely editorial but it still does not explain why the sudden somersault -- from treason for catching OBL to treason for helping, Mangal Bagh. Did it occur to anyone higher up how damaging it will be for Pakistan's image before the entire world -- as a cuckoo land.
May 31, 2012 1:25 pm
Or Vice versa
samar wylie tx
May 31, 2012 1:40 pm
Majority of pakistanies consider america is more greater enemy than india what a change.I like the title of the book by late ex president of pakistan ayub khan "FRIENDS NOT MASTER".
May 31, 2012 2:00 pm
Cyrus you know pretty well that Pakistan is not the only country in the world with a trust deficit. As if USA is the bastion of honesty and trustworthiness.Remember WMD anyone? Americas so-called trustworthiness has cost more lives and wreaked more havoc on this world than Pakistan can ever achieve. So give it a break will ya, its getting a bit tiring.
Ali Muhammad Khan
May 31, 2012 2:02 pm
Well No matter how much OBL was wanted & Notoriuos who gave this Dr Shakil the liberty to collude with a foreign Spy agency. Will US allow anyone this liberty in its own soil. Is Pakistani Soil less sacred ? Conviction of Dr Shakil is purely an internal matter of Pakistan & No one is allowed to enforce their will upon Pakistan or Coerce it. Dr shall pay for his deeds.
M. Asghar
May 31, 2012 2:01 pm
The basic problem is that Pakistan's geo-interests and those of US are at odd with each other, because US want to use Afghanistan as a base against it and China and this cannot be allowed for the future of the region. This story of the Doctor is part of the same game..
May 31, 2012 2:02 pm
If he was on the pay-roll of a foreign intelligence agency (CIA) he has to be punished.Period. Only with this precedent in place will future would-be helpers of the CIA be deterred.
May 31, 2012 3:15 pm
It is a laughing matter when you hear the new reasoning ,the same way as the Government Of Pakistan is a laughing stock. Shah
May 31, 2012 5:48 pm
The 'Doc' faked a vaccination program, for the sole purpose of obtaining DNA from children in the house. This in a country where those in most need of vaccination are already very suspicious of vaccines (Not entirely unreasonably). No matter how happy people are about gunning down OBL, Afridi is no hero. He is at best a mercenary, more likely a traitor, like America's Jonathon Pollard. He deserves jail.
Dr. D. Prithipaul
May 31, 2012 6:12 pm
How low can a nation sink in not knowing how to defend and preserve its national dignity when Pakistan reverses itself and proclaim Dr. Afridi's being innocent of treason just to reverse the American fine of $33 million!
May 31, 2012 6:16 pm
Dr. Afridi should be commended for helping bring justice to a man who is directly responsible for the death of thousands of Pakistanis... Is that not the definition of a patriot?
Usman Masood
May 31, 2012 6:37 pm
Write like an Editor Sir; not as a US aide ! Arbitrary allegations do not work. Back your argument with evidence. If you know who was supporting Mr Bin Laden, please provide the names so that they can be convicted. If you cannot, CIA will. So let things go the way they are. Don't get emotional. Relax!
May 31, 2012 8:20 pm
Had Pakistan ignored the good doctor or better yet announced that Pakistan was instrumental in bringing this world wide terrorist to justice the image and prestige of Pakistan in the eyes of the world would have improved. Instead Pakistan chooses to confirm to the world its government sides with and supports world wide terrorism even when the terrorists are killing, kidnapping and bombing the citizens of Pakistan. When will the people of Pakistan start asking why and hold the terrorists and there supporters responsible?
May 31, 2012 9:12 pm
Shakil Afridi was running a fake medical program. Wired's public health reporter Maryn McKeena reports that 'only one of the three doses were delivered, the vaccination was effectively useless.' Lives of innocent children were endangered by this fraud. A doctor is supposed to save lives and not endanger them. He did it acting as a spy. Therefore he deserves multiple punishments. Who was the mastermind of this criminal venture? His trial should be in a proper judicial body with clear legal jurisdiction.
May 31, 2012 10:18 pm
no one asks the right question in OBL managed to live in pakistan for many years?
Kashmir Khan
May 31, 2012 10:49 pm
Every thing is painted.....preplanned game..
May 31, 2012 11:53 pm
Pakistan seems to be run by the corrupt and fanatic! How can a fully developed legit state behave like a petulant, immature and a myopic rogue nation? There i no consistency in what Pakistan says or does as a nation. It has become an embarrassment to all educated Pakistanis.
May 31, 2012 11:53 pm
No offense but sometimes Pakistan acts like a child having a tantrum -- logic doesn't apply - the tantrum controls everything. Fortunately kids grow up and quit having tantrums -- don't think that's an option for Pakistan.
P. Joseph Raju
June 1, 2012 12:16 am
Pakistan is making a big mistake before the world by sentencing Dr.Arfridi to 33 years in jail. Actually this will make him a great (or made him) world hero. It is for the interest for Pakistan only, someone in authority there commute his sentence and set him free. Then allow him to go anywhere he wants to live as a free citizien.
Ajaya K Dutt
June 1, 2012 1:02 am
That is what editorial is pointing out. Effort by Dawn and other "liberal" ( I should say Judicious) sources is worthy a salute and bow.
June 1, 2012 2:57 am
No problem. Americans can bring Pakistani leader to their heel as the US dollars are the determining factor in the US-Pak relationship.
Aziz Wazir
June 1, 2012 3:49 pm
The editorial demands that the Dr ought to be treated in a regular court. Did all the tribal people not deserve the same treatment? Now we demand for external pressure to release it, then why not FCR should be finished? Terrorists, law enforcement agencies, drone attacks, army operation, all should be conducted under courts? Alas; the state consider tribal peoples on the same footing as the rest of the citizen.
June 1, 2012 4:48 pm
I think Pakistan has caused plenty of havoc inside its own country, Afghanistan and Kashmir. People living in glass houses should not throw stones
Explore: Indian elections 2014
Explore: Indian elections 2014
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
Front Page