SECP tightens restrictions for proscribed individuals

Published September 17, 2020
The SECP directives also state that if the responsible authority failed to comply with the requirements or submit a compliance report, a penalty extending up to Rs10  million will be imposed. — APP/File
The SECP directives also state that if the responsible authority failed to comply with the requirements or submit a compliance report, a penalty extending up to Rs10 million will be imposed. — APP/File

ISLAMABAD: Further restricting access to financial services, the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) has directed all non-bank financial institutions to issue red flags for associates of the proscribed individuals.

The SRO881(I)/2020 was issued under the SECP’s (Anti-Money Laundering and Coun­tering Financing of Terrorism) Regulations 2018, directing securities brokers, futures brokers, insurance companies, takaful operators, non-banking finance companies (NBFCs) and modarabas to scan their customer database for any linkages or association with proscribed persons.

The SECP directives also state that if the responsible authority failed to comply with the requirements or submit a compliance report, a penalty extending up to Rs10 million will be imposed and extended further if such contravention continues. The commission had already restricted access to finance for the persons named under the Schedule IV, Anti Terrorism Act 1997, in January and the current directive relates to individuals associated with the proscribed persons.

Under the directives, the ‘Regulated Persons’ (RP) includes securities brokers, futures brokers, insurance companies, Takaful operators, NBFCs and modarabas would place an alert related to customer’s fund, policy or block their transactions and lodge a suspicious transaction report (STR) with the Financial Monitoring Unit (FMU) of the finance ministry.

The SECP directed RPs to apply red flag indicators for persons or entities suspected to be acting on behalf of or at the direction of proscribed individuals or entities for customer appears to have conducted transactions on behalf of or at the direction of a proscribed individual.

The directives are also applicable to entities that have a designated proscribed individual on its board or management.

The red flag will be applicable if a customer is involved in providing financial or other assistance to designated proscribed individual if such reports have been highlighted in broadcast, print or social media.

The red flag will be placed on customers in wake of inquiry from law enforcement agency or intelligence agency indicating linkage of a customer with designated proscribed individual or entity.

The directives have been issued regarding applicability of red flags relating to non-banking financial institutions (NBFIs) including if a customer declares a proscribed person as a guarantor of loan or nominee of the customer.

In case of mutual funds account-to-account transfer involving transfer to a proscribed individual or entity, or a customer who is refused financial services such as loan due to association with a proscribed person approaches another financial institution for securing loan.

The directives to apply “Red Flags” based on behaviour of an Account Holder associated with proscribed individuals or entities includes same residential or office address that matches the known residential or office address of a designated proscribed individual.

If a customer has provided the same personal contact number that matches the contact number provided earlier by a proscribed designated customer, a customer depositing funds in the account of a person or entity listed in an international or foreign jurisdiction’s sanctions lists maintained in accordance with UNSC resolution 1373.

Published in Dawn, September 17th, 2020

Follow Dawn Business on Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram and Facebook for insights on business, finance and tech from Pakistan and across the world.

Opinion

Editorial

Rigging claims
Updated 04 May, 2024

Rigging claims

The PTI’s allegations are not new; most elections in Pakistan have been controversial, and it is almost a given that results will be challenged by the losing side.
Gaza’s wasteland
04 May, 2024

Gaza’s wasteland

SINCE the start of hostilities on Oct 7, Israel has put in ceaseless efforts to depopulate Gaza, and make the Strip...
Housing scams
04 May, 2024

Housing scams

THE story of illegal housing schemes in Punjab is the story of greed, corruption and plunder. Major players in these...
Under siege
Updated 03 May, 2024

Under siege

Whether through direct censorship, withholding advertising, harassment or violence, the press in Pakistan navigates a hazardous terrain.
Meddlesome ways
03 May, 2024

Meddlesome ways

AFTER this week’s proceedings in the so-called ‘meddling case’, it appears that the majority of judges...
Mass transit mess
03 May, 2024

Mass transit mess

THAT Karachi — one of the world’s largest megacities — does not have a mass transit system worth the name is ...