Squabbling politicians

Published March 23, 2019

IF there is one thing that the government and opposition parties could agree on, it would be disagreeing with each other at every opportunity — even if it meant that governance had to take a back seat with important decisions being perpetually stalled. Given a fresh opportunity to be at each other’s throats, the PTI and its political rivals are at loggerheads on the important issue of the implementation of the National Action Plan — a collective vow taken by political parties and institutions, in the aftermath of the 2014 Army Public School massacre, to tackle the plague of terrorism. As expected, due to political differences, major opposition parties are considering a boycott of a scheduled briefing on the implementation of NAP. The JUI-F has announced its decision to skip the March 28 meeting and the PML-N and PPP are mulling the boycott option, with Leader of the Opposition in the National Assembly Shahbaz Sharif stating that Prime Minister Imran Khan should brief the entire parliament instead of some lawmakers only, and the PPP saying it will be difficult for the party to sit with government functionaries after the “brutal police action” against its workers in Islamabad. Meanwhile, the government and opposition, by not holding the required consultations, have created yet another hurdle for the appointment of two ECP members.

That the two major opposition parties have serious political differences with the government — and vice versa — is hardly surprising. The months leading to last year’s general elections saw petty one-upmanship, name-calling and vitriol by both sides broadcast live into homes. Several months after the elections, egos remain inflated; the prime minister does not want to face the ruckus in the National Assembly; both he and Mr Sharif refuse to talk to or even greet each other; and the political environment across the country reeks of acrimony. The difference now is that the campaign season is a thing of the past, and parliament with its pending decisions is in limbo.

The chaotic circus of angry lawmakers needs to urgently correct their attitude. With high-priority decisions like NAP and the ECP appointments at stake, both the government and opposition parties must allow saner voices to engage in dialogue and find a solution so that cordial, productive consultations can take place. In this atmosphere, the words of Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi, who said, “One step at a time. Let us make a beginning”, are encouraging and must seriously be considered by the top leadership of the PTI, as the responsibility to take parliament forward lies with the prime minister. Mistrust and tit-for-tat accusations must be reconsidered so that serious deliberations can take place on matters crucial to democracy. Both parties must realise that they cannot hold back the democratic process as they assuage their bruised egos — they must pause the fighting and respect the process.

Published in Dawn, March 23rd, 2019

Editorial

Ominous demands
Updated 18 May, 2024

Ominous demands

The federal government needs to boost its revenues to reduce future borrowing and pay back its existing debt.
Property leaks
18 May, 2024

Property leaks

THE leaked Dubai property data reported on by media organisations around the world earlier this week seems to have...
Heat warnings
18 May, 2024

Heat warnings

STARTING next week, the country must brace for brutal heatwaves. The NDMA warns of severe conditions with...
Dangerous law
Updated 17 May, 2024

Dangerous law

It must remember that the same law can be weaponised against it one day, just as Peca was when the PTI took power.
Uncalled for pressure
17 May, 2024

Uncalled for pressure

THE recent press conferences by Senators Faisal Vawda and Talal Chaudhry, where they demanded evidence from judges...
KP tussle
17 May, 2024

KP tussle

THE growing war of words between KP Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur and Governor Faisal Karim Kundi is affecting...