Mentally ill on death row

Published January 12, 2017

HANGING a prisoner, and that too one diagnosed as mentally ill, is inhumane and does not serve the objectives of criminal justice. Black warrants being repeatedly issued for mentally ill prisoners expose serious anomalies in the justice system. Served with his third black warrant after 14 years on death row for killing a policeman, Khizer Hayat is scheduled to be hanged on Jan 17. Disturbingly, despite his counsel filing an application in the Lahore High Court to stay the execution, the prison authorities approached the sessions court for the warrant. Because Hayat’s case is under review at the National Commission for Human Rights, issuing a black warrant demonstrates negligence and perverts the course of justice. Diagnosed with schizophrenia in 2008, his medical reports were never presented as evidence to the Supreme Court by jail authorities in 2009. Again when he was examined by a court-appointed medical board in May 2016, it was concluded he suffered from delusions and psychosis. This lack of coordination between jail authorities, lawyers and the judicial system demonstrated on several occasions is unpardonable.

Given the irrevocable nature of the death penalty — a punishment this newspaper does not endorse — there is a critical need for the judiciary to comprehend the nature of mental illness. In Imdad Ali’s case, the Supreme Court’s controversial verdict ruled schizophrenia is a ‘recoverable’ disease in contrast to universal medical evidence stating it is incurable. That said, why have the jail authorities failed to approach the home department to hospitalise Hayat for treatment? Because the system is rigged against the poorer mentally ill prisoners, the latter’s cases hinge on inept state prosecutors and jail authorities. Given that the Ghulam brothers were wrongfully hanged — executed before their appeals were decided — the state must review capital punishment keeping in mind that there is no place for it in a society that upholds human rights as a supreme value.

Published in Dawn January 12th, 2017

Opinion

Editorial

Under siege
Updated 03 May, 2024

Under siege

Whether through direct censorship, withholding advertising, harassment or violence, the press in Pakistan navigates a hazardous terrain.
Meddlesome ways
03 May, 2024

Meddlesome ways

AFTER this week’s proceedings in the so-called ‘meddling case’, it appears that the majority of judges...
Mass transit mess
03 May, 2024

Mass transit mess

THAT Karachi — one of the world’s largest megacities — does not have a mass transit system worth the name is ...
Punishing evaders
02 May, 2024

Punishing evaders

THE FBR’s decision to block mobile phone connections of more than half a million individuals who did not file...
Engaging Riyadh
Updated 02 May, 2024

Engaging Riyadh

It must be stressed that to pull in maximum foreign investment, a climate of domestic political stability is crucial.
Freedom to question
02 May, 2024

Freedom to question

WITH frequently suspended freedoms, increasing violence and few to speak out for the oppressed, it is unlikely that...