ISLAMABAD: An Islamabad district and sessions judge has attached the luxurious Chak Shahzad farmhouse belonging to former president retired Gen Pervez Musharraf in a high treason case, as the special court trying the case has declared him an absconder.

A three-judge special court headed by Peshawar High Court Chief Justice Mazhar Alam Miankhel on July 19 declared Mr Musharraf an absconder, and ordered the confiscated of his movable and immovable properties.

According to details about Mr Musharraf’s properties submitted to the special court by the Ministry of Interior, the former dictator owns seven immovable properties and nine bank accounts.

The immovable properties include the Chak Shahzad farmhouse, land in the Army Housing Scheme in Karachi, Khayaban-i-Faisal, Defence Housing Authority (DHA) Karachi, Beach Street, DHA Islamabad and DHA Lahore.


Former dictator’s Chak Shahzad farmhouse is sub judice, ownership claimed by spouse


Mr Musharraf also operates nine bank accounts in Bank Alfalah, Askari Bank, Habib Metropolitan Bank, Standard Chartered Bank and the National Bank of Pakistan.

The farmhouse mentioned in the interior ministry’s details is disputed, since the matter is sub judice. Mr Musharraf’s wife, Sehba Musharraf, claims ownership of the house, which she says her husband gifted to her in 2008.

District and Sessions Judge (East) Islamabad Sohail Ikram, in pursuance of the special court’s order, held that “complaint No.01 of 2013 (regarding high treason) has been made before us that accused General (retired) Pervez Musharraf… has committed the offence of high treason…[and] is intentionally avoiding the execution of arrest warrants and as per available record has left the country”.

The judge’s order stated that “a proclamation has been issued and published required General (retired) Pervez Musharraf... to appear and answer the complaint till July 12, 2016”.

The order says that since Mr Musharraf has failed to comply with repeated notices from the special court, properties under his possession are liable to be attached.

Commenting on the attachment of properties, Faisal Hussain – a member of Mr Musharraf’s legal team – said the matter is already sub judice, and so Ms Musharraf may challenge the order.

He said that on July 19, the special court had allowed for disputed regarding properties belonging to the suspect to be challenged at the appropriate forum.

Published in Dawn November 17th, 2016

Opinion

Editorial

Enrolment drive
Updated 10 May, 2024

Enrolment drive

The authorities should implement targeted interventions to bring out-of-school children, especially girls, into the educational system.
Gwadar outrage
10 May, 2024

Gwadar outrage

JUST two days after the president, while on a visit to Balochistan, discussed the need for a political dialogue to...
Save the witness
10 May, 2024

Save the witness

THE old affliction of failed enforcement has rendered another law lifeless. Enacted over a decade ago, the Sindh...
May 9 fallout
Updated 09 May, 2024

May 9 fallout

It is important that this chapter be closed satisfactorily so that the nation can move forward.
A fresh approach?
09 May, 2024

A fresh approach?

SUCCESSIVE governments have tried to address the problems of Balochistan — particularly the province’s ...
Visa fraud
09 May, 2024

Visa fraud

THE FIA has a new task at hand: cracking down on fraudulent work visas. This was prompted by the discovery of a...