Modi’s Kashmir concerns

Published August 14, 2014
Comments such as those made by Mr Modi will only raise the temperature in the region and fail to address the real problem. — Photo by AFP
Comments such as those made by Mr Modi will only raise the temperature in the region and fail to address the real problem. — Photo by AFP

The issue of Kashmir is a perennial lightning rod in the subcontinent. Whenever leaders in both India and Pakistan wish to burnish their nationalist credentials, jingoistic references are made about the troubled territory.

In a similar vein, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi used a visit to Leh — his second to India-held Kashmir after securing the top slot — to slam Pakistan and revive memories of 1999’s Kargil imbroglio. Speaking to the Indian troops, Mr Modi castigated Pakistan for engaging “in a proxy war” while he recalled the infiltration of Kargil.

Considering his audience — Indian military personnel — it can safely be said that Mr Modi was playing to the gallery. While there has been some militant activity in India-held Kashmir, the most recent incident being an ambush of troops near Srinagar, as well as cross-LoC trading of fire by both militaries, Mr Modi knows there is no comparison with the situation that existed two decades ago.

At the height of the Kashmir insurgency in the late ’80s and throughout much of the ’90s, hundreds of deaths were reported every year from the held territory, including a high civilian death toll. Today there is no such parallel; instead, there is a feeling of isolation from India in Kashmir and periodic waves of unrest — much of this is due to the harsh laws in place in the region as well as the heavy Indian military presence.

Comments such as those made by Mr Modi will only raise the temperature in the region and fail to address the real problem. And we must accept that Kashmir remains an unresolved issue.

Pakistan’s Foreign Office, while criticising the Indian prime minister, said Islamabad seeks “good, neighbourly relations” with India. Both countries must realise that good neighbours discuss their differences in a calm, logical manner and do not go about accusing each other in public.

If India has concerns about infiltration — which is indeed unacceptable — it needs to communicate these via diplomatic channels. Issuing combative statements only makes the resolution of outstanding issues all the more difficult.

Published in Dawn, August 14th, 2014

Opinion

A state of chaos

A state of chaos

The establishment’s increasingly intrusive role has further diminished the credibility of the political dispensation.

Editorial

Bulldozed bill
Updated 22 May, 2024

Bulldozed bill

Where once the party was championing the people and their voices, it is now devising new means to silence them.
Out of the abyss
22 May, 2024

Out of the abyss

ENFORCED disappearances remain a persistent blight on fundamental human rights in the country. Recent exchanges...
Holding Israel accountable
22 May, 2024

Holding Israel accountable

ALTHOUGH the International Criminal Court’s prosecutor wants arrest warrants to be issued for Israel’s prime...
Iranian tragedy
Updated 21 May, 2024

Iranian tragedy

Due to Iran’s regional and geopolitical influence, the world will be watching the power transition carefully.
Circular debt woes
21 May, 2024

Circular debt woes

THE alleged corruption and ineptitude of the country’s power bureaucracy is proving very costly. New official data...
Reproductive health
21 May, 2024

Reproductive health

IT is naïve to imagine that reproductive healthcare counts in Pakistan, where women from low-income groups and ...