Israel’s disastrous plan

Published March 28, 2014

ON Wednesday, the Arab summit in Kuwait lent its categorical support to the Palestinian Authority by refusing to accept Israel as a Jewish state because doing so in its eyes would be tantamount to reducing Palestine’s sons of the soil to the status of serfs on their own land. That Israel should be a Jewish state was inherent in the Balfour Declaration issued by Britain in 1917, and all Israeli governments have followed this policy by encouraging Jews from all over the world to settle in the country and squeezing the Arabs out of Israel proper and the occupied territories. The hardline government headed by Benjamin Netanyahu has officially adopted this policy and has been pressing the PA to accept it. More pernicious has been the plan to repudiate the 1967 border and draw up a scheme for territorial ‘adjustments’ and ‘transfer’ — nothing less than a euphemism for expulsion — of Palestinians from their ancestral lands. As reported in the Western media, this plan is being studied from the point of view of international law. If Israel succeeds in this scheme, gobbles up more territory and manages to evict a majority of Palestinians from their ancestral land, it would only exacerbate tensions.

Even if Israel was envisaged as a homeland for the Jewish people, does that mean that the state should consider draconian steps to ensure that those who have equal right to the land but are not of the Jewish faith should be forced to leave, losing forever the ‘right of return’? Onwards from the 1990s, after that historic handshake on the grounds of the White House that saw the Israelis and Palestinians seal a deal to implement a two-state formula, the peace process is headed in anything but the right direction, with Israel, and the US policy of going along with the latter’s intransigence, primarily responsible for this faulty trajectory. In an already burning Middle East, Israel’s plan if implemented would be nothing short of a catastrophic blow to the region.

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.