ISLAMABAD, June 21: Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) on Friday grilled the property tycoon Malik Riaz Hussain in sponsored Haj case.

The Ministry of Interior had offered the Haj facility to 427 politicians, journalists and employees of Bahira Town in 2009 and 2010, but the payment from the sponsors was received after months’ delay.

Qasier Qadeer Qureshi, legal adviser to Bahria Town, confirmed that the property tycoon was quizzed by the FIA officials.

According to him, Malik Riaz informed the FIA investigators that he had cleared all the dues for the sponsored Haj.

Sources in the FIA told Dawn that Malik Riaz maintained before the FIA team that since he was unaware of the payment hence the delay.

The sources alleged that Malik Riaz made payment after Supreme Court took cognizance of the matter.

The issue of sponsored Haj was taken up by the Supreme Court in 2011 during the hearing of suo motu notice case related to the corruption of Haj arrangements.

On the directions of the Supreme Court the FIA in 2011 had also recorded the statement of those who availed the ‘free’ Haj facility.

The Religious Affairs Ministry had demanded outstanding bills worth millions from the interior ministry.

Former Religious Affairs Minister Hamid Saeed Kazmi when contacted said that the Interior Ministry and its sponsors had arranged travelling of the sponsored pilgrims from Pakistan to Saudi Arabia and back.

But the Religious Affairs Ministry provided them accommodation and local transport during their stay in KSA on the request of then Minister for Interior Rehman Malik.

Later, it had demanded from the Interior Ministry the standard charges for the facilities it provided to the government sponsored pilgrims, he added.

A senior FIA official on condition of anonymity said that the property tycoon and a former deputy speaker of National Assembly sponsored the Haj for the politicians and the journalists but did not pay the required amount either to the Ministry of Interior who had invited them or to the Ministry of Religious Affairs who provided accommodation to these pilgrims.

He said that after the statement of Malik Riaz, the FIA summoned the authorities of Interior Ministry and the Ministry of Religious Affairs to decide the fate of tycoon.

He explained that the accommodation provided to the 427 private persons including 32 employees of Bahria Town were arranged from the amount which the pilgrims had deposited with the national exchequer for performing Haj and misuse of the said amount was an offence.

Malik Riaz did not voluntarily return the amount to the government but FIA recovered from him the required payment, he added.

“In the light of the statements of the officials concerned of Interior Ministry and Religious Affairs Ministry, the investigators would determine whether any crime would be made out against the tycoon or not” the official maintained.

More From This Section

Senate in disbelief over Kashmir Highway ‘deadline’

ISLAMABAD: It is often said that the people are wary of politicians’ promises. But on Thursday, the Senate...

Bombers’ trail leads to arrests from guava farm in south Punjab

Officials said they are comparing the bombers’ modus operandi with that of TTP and UBA in Islamabad Sabzi Mandi blast.

Experts stress women’s role in poverty alleviation

ISLAMABAD: Speakers at a conference here on Thursday stressed the role of women in alleviating poverty in the...

Google Maps to be used for joint patrolling by police

Police will use Google Maps to define the patrolling points and as well as the beats and pickets in the cities.


Comments are closed.

Comments (2)

Naeem Syed
June 22, 2013 5:28 pm

The money has been repaid. Big Deal. If the Supreme Court had not taken cognizance, would Mr. Riaz Malik have paid? Its not a question of IF, there had to have been criminal intent,that's why the Court took notice, therefore prosecution should be mandatory. FIA's credibility is at stake here.

Abdul Rahman Khan
June 22, 2013 6:30 pm

Poor Malik Riaz. Guess this is offshoot of what? He shouldn't have unmasked the (mis)deeds of the son of a big shot. By the way, what happend to that case against the son?

Explore: Indian elections 2014
Explore: Indian elections 2014
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
Cartoons
E-PAPER
Front Page