ISLAMABAD, March 11: The Supreme Court on Friday advised people to check their facts with the Registrar before making statements on sensitive matters.

The advice came in the wake of claims that the Punjab government was functioning on account of a stay order issued by the apex court.

Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry issued the order after the chief law officer of Punjab, in the company of 10 press reporters, searched in vain for the alleged stay on the court website and relevant record of the court in the Registrar's office. The office carried out the search on the chief justice's instructions.

During the hearing of the Haj scam, a visibly disturbed court had taken notice of allegations raised during television programmes as well as published in the print media that the Punjab government was functioning on the basis of a stay order.

The controversy relates to a petition filed by Shahid Orakzai challenging the eligibility of Mian Shahbaz Sharif for holding the office of chief minister. The petition is pending before the Supreme Court. But no such stay was ever issued by the court.

In his petition, Mr Orakzai had contended that Shahbaz Sharif was not entitled to hold the office of the chief minister as he had vacated provincial constituency PP-10 Rawalpindi and had resigned from constituency PP-48 Bhakkar after his election as chief executive of the province.

Without having any seat in the assembly, he could not hold any office. On an earlier directive of the apex court, Mr Orakzai had withdrawn a similar petition pending before the Lahore High Court.

On Friday the chief justice in his order stated that the Advocate General of Punjab, Khawaja Mohammad Haris, was asked to clarify whether any case relating to stay being granted in favour of the Punjab government was pending in the Supreme Court.

Complying with the orders of the court, Khawaja Haris visited the office of the Registrar and examined the record and found no case pending. The registrar also submitted his report to the chief justice in which he suggested that if any individual had information about such a stay order, he should bring it to the notice of the court.

The chief justice also offered that if any such case was pending, it would be fixed before the court on March 14.

In future, the chief justice said in his order, if anyone intends to make any statement in the above context, he should try check his facts with the registrar instead of coming out with a version which is not supported by the court record.

Meanwhile, in a press statement Khawaja Haris, the advocate general, asserted that there was no stay order of any nature passed by any court in Pakistan by virtue of which the government of Punjab was functioning.

He also requested the media to refrain from broadcasting or publishing such “false and malicious statements”.

Unless the authenticity of the statement is verified from the registrar of the court concerned, dissemination of such false statements was aimed at maligning the superior judiciary and amounted to committing contempt of court, Khawaja Haris said.

Opinion

Editorial

Rigging claims
Updated 04 May, 2024

Rigging claims

The PTI’s allegations are not new; most elections in Pakistan have been controversial, and it is almost a given that results will be challenged by the losing side.
Gaza’s wasteland
04 May, 2024

Gaza’s wasteland

SINCE the start of hostilities on Oct 7, Israel has put in ceaseless efforts to depopulate Gaza, and make the Strip...
Housing scams
04 May, 2024

Housing scams

THE story of illegal housing schemes in Punjab is the story of greed, corruption and plunder. Major players in these...
Under siege
Updated 03 May, 2024

Under siege

Whether through direct censorship, withholding advertising, harassment or violence, the press in Pakistan navigates a hazardous terrain.
Meddlesome ways
03 May, 2024

Meddlesome ways

AFTER this week’s proceedings in the so-called ‘meddling case’, it appears that the majority of judges...
Mass transit mess
03 May, 2024

Mass transit mess

THAT Karachi — one of the world’s largest megacities — does not have a mass transit system worth the name is ...