Low Graphics Site
White bar
.: Latest News :. .: News in Pictures :.
Dawn e-paper

Daily SectionMarker



Misc SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker



Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald

Archive, Search

Weather

FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Irfan Hussain Jawed Naqvi Mahir Ali Kamran Shafi The Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

September 04, 2008 Thursday Ramazan 3, 1429


KARACHI: Contempt notice issued against EDO


KARACHI, Sept 3: A contempt-of-court notice was issued against the executive district officer (EDO) of the city government’s revenue department for Sept 19 by a division bench of the Sindh High Court comprising Justice Munib Ahmed Khan and Justice Dr Rana M. Shamim here on Wednesday.

The order came in a contempt of court application filed by Abrar Hasan, a displaced resident of a katchi abadi in Gulshan-i-Iqbal and affected person of the Lyari expressway project. The petitioner maintained that a bench of the SHC, deciding a constitutional petition, had ordered payment of compensation to him but the respondents were denying him the payment.

The bench after hearing the counsel for the applicant issued a contempt-of-court notice to the EDO Revenue for Sept 19.

Petition for salary

A division bench of the SHC, comprising Justices Khilji Arif Hussain and Bin Yamin, on Wednesday issued notices to respondents, including the inspector-general of prisons, Sindh, in a petition filed by the computer operators hired for imparting computer skills to prisoners.

The petitioners, Irshad Hussain and 24 others, maintained that they had not been paid salaries for a year and thus they were facing financial hardship.

A bench of the SHC earlier in a petition restrained the government from sacking the petitioners.

The bench, after hearing the counsel for the petitioners, also sought comments from the respondents while putting off further proceedings to a date to be fixed later by the office of the court.—APP







Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

RSS Feed

Newsletters

DAWN Logo

News on Mobile

e-paper print replica


The DAWN Media Group

| About Us | Advertising info | Subscription | Feedback | Contributions | Privacy Policy | Help | Contact us |