Galvanizing the Muslim countries
By Fateh M. Chaudhri
AN extraordinary summit of the 36-year-old Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC) is being held in Makkah at the invitation of King Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz to define the Ummah’s response to the multiple challenges it faces internally and externally.
At a more specific level, the summit will discuss the report of the OIC’s Commission of Eminent Persons (CEP) from 17 Muslim countries, which addresses issues of great significance such as fighting terrorism, alleviating poverty, promoting women’s education, combating corruption and mismanagement, encouraging regional economic integration and development through intra-OIC free trade agreements and forging institutional cooperation between the OIC and the Islamic Development Bank (IDB), World Bank (WB), World Trade Organization (WTO), as well as regional blocs
The discussions are likely to be held away from the media glare and would hopefully result in the adoption of a “Ten Year Reform Programme of Action” to revitalize the OIC based on the CEP deliberations over the last couple of years.
Even though the OIC is 36 years old, it is still a debating forum, lacking the capacity to play the kind of role that the leaders of the Muslim world have been urging it to play. Formed in 1969, it has held a number of summits since then but the outcomes have been nothing more than “non-binding” resolutions on Palestine and Jerusalem. Some other issues like Kashmir were only discussed on the ‘sidelines’ of the various summits.
Meanwhile, a consensus is building up in all the OIC member countries that its role should be redefined and its organizational structures revitalized. The crisis of confidence in the OIC countries cannot be allowed to aggravate any further because it would push the Ummah into more and more turbulent waters. A consensus is also emerging that in the tasks ahead the OIC and the Islamic Development Bank (IDB) need to galvanize their respective political skills and financial resources to devise effective strategies without which the Ummah would lurch from one crisis to another.
We are passing through and facing the hardest times in our history. There is a widespread perception in the Muslim countries that “Islam is under attack.” Some of the most dominant leaders of the western would are of the view that the war on terrorism is a “long-lasting ideological struggle.” The challenge for the OIC countries, therefore, is to survive and, hopefully, forge ahead and it depends substantially on the performance of their economies and the allocation of economic resources to their national security and developmental imperatives, including scientific and technological progress.
Talking of security needs, we must realize that the new weapons are so powerful and fast in speed that the protection function of time and space has shrunken to almost zero. Additionally, given the rapid rate of obsolescence in weapons system, the OIC member countries should want their defence industry to adapt its output to changes in military requirements and be self-reliant.
In the long run, say 30 to 35 years, the OIC can have economic and scientific power that could rival the very best in the world. Undoubtedly, it is an extraordinary task that would require extraordinary zeal, effort and resources. We must start establishing world class sciences and technology institutes. We have lot of catching up to do. For example, despite Pakistan being a nuclear power, the share of its scientists article in mainstream international journals is minuscule — 0.06 per cent while that of Brazil is 10 per cent and India 30 per cent.
In order to develop both a vision and plans of actions in OIC member-countries, one of the first prerequisites is to have a strong analytical capability. If we accept the need to develop robust economies then we need to focus on measures through which we can appreciably accelerate economic development, especially keeping in view the current World Trade Organization’s (WTO) new regime.
At the same time we must devise policy measures to avoid costs associated with undesirable consequences of pursuing implementation of growth-inducing measures, for a example, inflation and uneven distribution of wealth. However, it is also a fact that the benefits of development in the resource-rich OIC member countries have not gone to the populace in general, and unnecessary poverty is widespread. Future development strategies must address this issue.
As a general rule, OIC members must focus on operations and performance of the private enterprise economy through adequate incentives and a predominant public sector role in the adequate provision of, and priority to, quality education, provision of public health services, and the establishment of a social and economic infrastructure. We must not hesitate to learn from the best practices anywhere in the world (as the West did several centuries ago from the Islamic world) and adapt them to our requirements. New economic powerhouses and scientific prowess have been emerging in China, Taiwan, Korea, Australia, New Zealand etc. which could provide the training ground for the OIC’s budding scientists. If the OIC becomes seriously interested in accelerating growth performance and enhancing security, then it would call for many individuals and groups to engage in specific studies leading towards actual agendas and strategies, country-by-country, as well as collective action by them as a distinct group. It is only in a growing economy that the larger proportion of resources to the security apparatus is feasible and politically acceptable.
Let me mention just a few other important ingredients of robust growth: i) overall economic growth without efficient agricultural development and food security is not sustainable; ii) in the ruthlessly competitive new WTO regime in 2005 and beyond, the manufacturing, exports and services sectors would need to be super-efficient and competitive in terms of quality, cost and delivery mechanisms; iii) energy supply is fundamental; oil is too expensive for many OIC countries. Solar energy is an alternative that the OIC member countries cannot afford to overlook any longer; iv) human resource development is critical and in this context women’s development and utilization of female segment of our societies should be promoted by building female plazas, banks, garment factories, computer services centres etc. exclusively for women v) no child of the schoolgoing age should be out of school or left behind because of poverty; and vi) most importantly, science and technology institutions, staffed with world class, highly motivated and inspiring teachers must be promoted.
In the short-run we must initiate large-scale scholarship programmes by establishing the OIC Science and Technology Trust Fund. In the long run, the majority of scholars must be produced in indigenous institutions by expanding the science and technology infrastructure. The place to start is the best set of existing universities and research facilities in the OIC countries.
Many of the ideas can be fleshed out by adopting project/task oriented approaches under the guidance of eminent Muslim scholars. In order to promote economic development, the OIC member countries could also enter into Preferential Trade Agreements (PTA) and/or Free Trade Agreement (FTA) among themselves or with any other country that could benefit them. Here, the IDB as a premium institution has a fundamental and central role to play. The IDB’s pro-active policy and strategy-oriented approach would make substantial contributions to the achievement of many desirable goals.
The OIC needs to invest heavily both in terms of financial resources and skilled personnel in “public diplomacy” programme aimed at improving the image of Muslims in today’s world. We must spend at least 10 per cent of what we allocate for defence in OIC countries on this front. The reason is simple but compelling. The average westerner holds tainted image of Islam and the Muslims. The widespread western view is that the downfall of Muslims owes mainly to religion that teaches them to be fanatics and passive believers in fatalism. Therefore, Muslims are to be freed from outdated beliefs, backward social practices, empty rituals and need to be induced to adopt the modern ways of the West by giving them freedom and democracy. Some of these are half truths and others self-serving assertions.
We must shake off the “intellectual stagnation” into which we have fallen and fully participate in mankind’s advance towards higher social and scientific platforms. The decline of the Muslims is not due to any shortcoming in Islam but to our own failure to live up to it. Undoubtedly, we have to get rid of meaningless rituals, superstitions, fatalism wherever they have been inflicted on our social fabric and thought processes.
We can minimize hostilities between the West and Muslim countries by developing world-class scholars well-versed in the core message of Islam and highly skilled in articulating and communicating the true values of the religion in modern, effective ways through the print and electronic media, video conferences and seminars. The OIC must play an effective role in projecting Islam as a religion of peace and moderation. We must talk to groups like the European Union and convince them that terrorists who commit crimes in the name of Islam are violators of the religion’s tenets. We must assert that militants are only fringe elements in our societies and that the mainstream silent majority is both enlightened and moderate.
Additionally, we should be inviting “opinion makers” in the western world to our countries and show how hospitable an average Muslim is, thereby destroying the negative profiling and stereotyped image of muslims as terrorists.
The OIC should also be projecting the truth that since core political problems in the Muslim world like Palestine and Kashmir have been created by western countries, they also have a moral obligation to help resolve them. Once these problems are resolved to the satisfaction of the people involved, a substantial chunk of financial and human resources can be saved to boost social indicators.
fatehchaudhri@hotmail.com


