Low Graphics Site
White bar
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Horoscope Recipes Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Dawn Classified



FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

April 27, 2003 Sunday Safar 24, 1424


KARACHI: Status quo ordered in Sabzimandi allottees’ case



By Our Staff Reporter


KARACHI, April 26: Sindh High Court on Friday asked fruit merchants, commission agents and the market committee of the new fruit and vegetable market (New Sabzimandi) on Super Highway to maintain status quo in their dispute over the allotment and possession of plots pending adjudication of their conflicting claims. The plaintiff fruit merchants had claimed that they were rightful allottees of the plots measuring 600 square yards each but were given possession of only 300 square yard-plots on payment of half of the price. However, it was mutually agreed that the remaining halves of the plots would be handed over on payment of the balance money. Illegalities and irregularities soon gained momentum in allotment of the plots as their market prices started going up. The multiple litigation went up to the Supreme Court which deputed the provincial ombudsman to look into the matter.

The ombudsman had submitted his report in June 2000 and pointed out that there was no approved plan for the sabzimandi; there were cases of double allotments leading to litigation; areas earmarked for roads and parks were also leased out; allotments were at times made in disregard of the size of plots; and kickbacks were accepted to favour new applicants.

The plaintiffs alleged that when they started raising pucca structures on the plots allotted to them, the market committee officials demanded extra payments as illegal gratification.

The SHC Nazir visited the site in January 2003 and endorsed the plaintiffs’ grievance that they were being forcibly dispossessed and their merchandise being seized.

The plaintiffs claimed a sum of Rs5 million by way of damages for losses suffered by them and a permanent injunction against the market committee to restrain it from dispossessing them.

After hearing Advocate Mohammad Nawaz Shaikh in favour of the plaintiffs, Justice Zahid Kurban Alavi ordered both sides to maintain status quo pending the disposal of the suit.

In another suit, instituted by Syed Ali Gohar Shah, son of Pir Mardan Shah of Pagara, the judge issued notices to the Sindh Utilization Department, revenue officials and private defendants. He asked them to maintain status quo pending hearing of the plaint. The plaintiff claimed that he had purchased 2,738 square yard land in KDA Scheme 33, Deh Safooran, Taluka Malir, from a builder/developer in 1992. The land remained in his peaceful possession until recently when on the basis of ‘fabricated’ documents, some officials and private individuals, who wanted to set up a CNG station on his plot, sought its vacation.

The plaintiff sought a declaration in his favour and a permanent injunction against the defendants.



Click to learn more...
Please Visit our Sponsor (Ads open in separate window)

Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2005