LAHORE: A court on Wednesday formally charged Raymond Davis, a CIA contractor, on two counts of murder at a hearing held at a prison in Lahore, a police official said.

Davis, 36, shot dead two Pakistanis in the eastern city on January 27 following what he described as an attempted armed robbery. He said he acted in self-defence and the United States says he has diplomatic immunity and should be repatriated.

“He has been indicted,” a police investigator assigned to the case told Reuters from inside Kot Lakhpat prison, where the trial is being held under tight security.

If convicted, Davis could face the death penalty.

Blood money?

The case has tested ties between the United States and Pakistan, a vital ally in the US-led campaign against Taliban militants in Afghanistan.

Questions surround the identity of the victims, with some media reports saying the men worked for Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) agency, and that they might have been known to Davis.

Other reports suggest they were armed robbers who had already targeted others in Lahore before attempting to rob Davis, tailing him on motor bikes along a congested city road.

The case has also strained ties between the CIA and the ISI, which said it was unaware Davis was working in Pakistan.

There is mounting speculation the United States might back payment to the victims' families of compensation, or blood money, as laid out under Pakistani law, even if it is loathe to support a payment in what it sees as a case of self-defence.

Under that scenario, Pakistan could facilitate US contact with the families of the two slain men — and, presumably, the family of a third man who was struck and killed by a US vehicle going to help Davis after the shooting — to offer a deal.

“The best, perhaps the only, option for the government is to pacify the relatives of those killed to come to some compromise,” said Talat Masood, a retired Pakistani general.

“It's the only option everyone seems to be working on.”

Such payments are sanctioned by Islamic law and are common in some parts of Pakistan as a way to settle disputes. But the victims' families would have to agree.

A US embassy spokesman said he had no knowledge of any negotiations to settle the case. The principle of diplomatic immunity was key to the case, the spokesman added.

Editorial

Updated 08 Aug, 2026

Danger ahead

PAKISTAN has already paid a heavy human price this monsoon, even as another dangerous spell approaches. NDMA figures...
08 Aug, 2026

Israeli impunity

ANY hope that Hamas’s decision to disarm would lead to a breakthrough has been dashed for one simple reason:...
08 Aug, 2026

Flawed investigations

THE botched case of a young Karachi businessman, Mir Raza Ali, who died under suspicious circumstances, took a new...
07 Aug, 2026

Terrorist havens

DESPITE the use of both carrots and sticks by the international community, the Afghan Taliban refuse to cut their...
Updated 07 Aug, 2026

Mineral wealth

Any future agreements involving critical minerals must be subjected to rigorous legal, financial and technical scrutiny.
07 Aug, 2026

Growth denied

THE Sindh government’s agreement with the World Bank to combine health, nutrition, sanitation, social protection...