Shutting down X

Published

THE latest threat by the government to shut down the social media platform X if it does not ‘cooperate’ with official demands is a perilous escalation in Pakistan’s battle with digital dissent. This is not about regulating harmful content; governments everywhere grapple with that challenge. It reflects a desire to curb access to independent avenues of expression whenever they counter the state’s narratives. Behind official vocabulary lies a familiar impulse: the state’s paranoia regarding dissent especially where it concerns the PTI. In that context, the fact that investigations are ‘underway’ into former prime minister Imran Khan’s X account is not surprising. Blocking Mr Khan’s account — which admittedly does appear to be run from outside the country — and threatening to bar a global platform if it refuses to comply, reveals the lengths to which the state is willing to go to stop criticism of itself. The justification offered is that the matter relates to ‘terrorism’. But our own history shows that invoking the charge of terrorism against political entities is an exaggeration the state has long deployed against those who have fallen out of favour. The comparison with Brazil, where X was blocked after failing to comply with supreme court orders, is also misplaced. Brazil’s dispute revolved around judicial directives aimed at curbing disinformation. Pakistan’s case revolves around politics.

What is alarming is how casually the government frames the prospect of banning an entire communication platform. Pakistan has already weathered repeated disruptions to X this year; to now threaten a shutdown betrays the fragility of our democratic norms. The government must understand that the world is watching. Each threat or action taken to crack down on social media platforms raises questions about the country’s commitment to free expression — in the case of not only the PTI but other legitimate entities too. If the authorities wish to protect the country’s credibility, they must focus on bringing transparency, tolerance and restraint to their actions.

Published in Dawn, December 13th, 2025

Editorial

Updated 09 Aug, 2026

Makkah agreement

IN the midst of a gruelling war between the US and Iran — currently at a stalemate — the signing of the Makkah...
09 Aug, 2026

Conflicting priorities

THERE is a reasonable argument that the democratic process must go on regardless of prevailing conditions; that...
09 Aug, 2026

FIFA controversy

FIFA PRESIDENT Gianni Infantino is at the centre of a storm of his own making. Even after a crisis meeting in...
Updated 08 Aug, 2026

Danger ahead

PAKISTAN has already paid a heavy human price this monsoon, even as another dangerous spell approaches. NDMA figures...
08 Aug, 2026

Israeli impunity

ANY hope that Hamas’s decision to disarm would lead to a breakthrough has been dashed for one simple reason:...
Updated 08 Aug, 2026

Flawed investigations

An inaccurate record of a victim’s wounds hinders the dispensation of justice. Medical examiners in such a critical area cannot cut corners.