ISLAMABAD: The Pun­jab Bar Council (PbBC) on Sunday “condemned” the Pakistan Bar Council’s call for removal of Law Minister Farogh Naseem from the cabinet and termed the demand illegal and immoral.

In a statement, chairman of the PbBC’s executive committee Jamil Asghar Bhatti said that lawyers of the country stood by Law Minister Farogh Naseem in the wake of the demand by the Pakistan Bar Council (PBC) for his removal which was based on “mala fide intention”.

Mr Bhatti said that some “elements with vested interests” wanted to “politicise” the presidential reference against Supreme Court judge Qazi Faez Isa “to fulfill their personal agendas”.

In a strongly worded statement on the issue of the surveillance of judges, PBC vice chairman Abid Saqi had on Saturday urged Prime Minister Imran Khan “to immediately expel the law minister from the federal cabinet in the larger national interest and continuity of the democratically elected government, lest it is too late”.

The PBC vice chairman had also demanded a thorough investigation by a judicial commission while alleging that the role, conduct and activities of the law minister were aimed at undermining independence of the judiciary and conti­nuity of democratic process and thus they were against the national interest and earning a bad name for the government.

Law Minister Naseem had in a statement rubbished the demand for his resignation, describing it as non-serious and said that he considered the legal fraternity as his own family.

“There are only a few factions in the bar which are raising such demands only to gain some political mileage,” the minister had stated.

Mr Bhatti in his statement praised the law minister for his “patriotism”, saying that Mr Naseem had always worked for the supremacy of the Consti­tution and law and worked day and night for independence of the judiciary and welfare of the lawyers’ ­community.

He said the federal government had submitted the reference against Justice Faez Isa in accordance with the Constitution. He said the decision of the Supreme Judicial Council on the ­reference would be acceptable to the entire legal ­community.

Published in Dawn, February 24th, 2020

Editorial

06 Aug, 2026

Need for dialogue

THE interior minister’s comments at an Islamabad seminar last week have sparked many a conversation about the ...
06 Aug, 2026

Bad press

THE government’s move to impose restrictions on international media will not only alienate the foreign press, it...
06 Aug, 2026

Automobile concerns

PAKISTAN’S automobile industry is at a critical juncture. Sharp cuts in tariffs on the import of completely built...
Updated 05 Aug, 2026

State of confusion

FROM the looks of it, America has no exit strategy to extricate itself from the disastrous war with Iran. US...
05 Aug, 2026

Pension decision

THE government’s decision to formally operationalise the new Defined Contribution Pension Fund Scheme is a step...
05 Aug, 2026

Preventable deaths

THE deaths of 144 children from measles and diphtheria in Karachi during the first seven months of the year expose a...