WASHINGTON: Taking action against terrorist groups is fundamental to addressing the scourge of terrorism, says the US State Department while commenting on Pakistan’s decision to ban media coverage of extremist outfits.

On Nov 2, Pakistan’s electronic media watchdog Pemra banned media coverage of three key extremist groups, Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jamaatud Dawa and Falah-i-Insanyat.

Pemra also attached with the order a list of 60 proscribed groups and 12 others on its watch list, indicating that the ban also applied to them.

At the State Department’s briefing on Wednesday afternoon, an Indian journalist called the ban a violation of freedom of expression and asked spokesman John Kirby to condemn it.

Also read: Who asked Pemra to ban JuD, others?

“We’re certainly aware of those reports, and I would refer you to the government of Pakistan for information on its decision,” said the US official. “We obviously continue to urge steps to constrain militant groups operating in the region, including these two in particular – JUD and LeT.”

Mr Kirby reminded the journalist that LeT was a designated foreign terrorist organisation. “We absolutely believe that taking actions against them are fundamental to addressing the scourge of terrorism. There’s no question where we are on that,” he said.

US President Barack Obama also discussed the issue with Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif during a meeting at the White House on Oct 22.

Mr Kirby’s response to questions on the issue at the briefing made it obvious that the US backed Pakistan’s actions against banned terrorist organisations.

The back and forth questions and answers generated an almost 1400-word transcript but it failed persuade the US official to condemn the Pakistani action.

“On the actual ban itself … we regularly discuss with all our partners the importance of balancing this fight against terrorism, and there’s a need there, with the imperative to preserve civil liberties, including freedom of expression and freedom of the press,” he said.

When another journalist asked him why was he reluctant to call the Pakistani action a “bad thing”, Mr Kirby said: “Pakistan should speak for itself and for why it made this decision and how it’s going to execute this decision.”

Published in Dawn, November 6th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Editorial

31 Jul, 2026

Expanding conflict

WITH neither of the belligerents willing to back down, and the theatre of conflict expanding geographically, the...
31 Jul, 2026

Spoils and spats

A FIGHT over assembly seats in Azad Jammu and Kashmir has laid bare what seem to be some deep resentments between ...
31 Jul, 2026

Unfair tax system

THE disclosure that the FBR collected nearly Rs1.9tr in sales and income taxes through electricity bills over the...
30 Jul, 2026

Debt that stays

THE power sector’s circular debt grew by Rs61bn in the last fiscal year, taking the total to roughly Rs1.67tr from...
30 Jul, 2026

HIV warning

THE HIV infections detected around two SESSI-run hospitals in Karachi demand far more than another hurried committee...
30 Jul, 2026

End trafficking

MODERN slavery, in the form of human trafficking, is among the state’s gravest failures. Scores of Pakistanis are...