Pardoned PCO judges

Published November 15, 2009

IT is all very fine that PCO judges who offered unconditional apologies have been admitted to the court's indulgence and the contempt notices recalled.

But one question that agitates all thinking minds is whether it would be appropriate for some of them after pardon to continue holding high judicial offices which they wangled or were bestowed on post-retirement as the government's bounty.

Clearly, in the case of PCO judges it was no ordinary contempt, consisting in non-compliance of a court's process, obstructing 'justice'.

Here is an altogether different genre, an unmitigated institutional betrayal or veritable defection by some gnomes of the highest judiciary in aid of generalissimo's hubristic coup de main to zap the Constitution for nothing nobler than lucre or lure of office.

The way they went grovelling under the table in front of the Lord Protector, apart from disgracing them, had serious knock-on effects to the point of shaking the very foundation of the polity.

They first unabashedly defied the court when they found it profitable to defy and then were no laggards to apologise when it came to save their bacon.

This is opportunism par excellence; and to me an uncanny reminder of abominable 'simony' being practised in mediaeval ecclesiastical Europe where pardons and benefices were bought and sold.

True, most of the contemnors, who in some cases still had many years to go, had to buy their pardon by seeking premature retirement which by itself is punishment enough.

But what about others who have not taken a similar knock? To let them remain ensconced in their new-fangled offices on the presumption that the court's pardon has bleached them through and through is a postulate one cannot reconcile with. For, there is certainly something about chastised contemnors holding high judicial offices which is not kosher, technical niceties aside.

Pardon in any case can at best save the contemnors from the punitive arm of law but cannot purge them of the stench of a festering moral stigma which by its pungency will ever neutralise all the perfumes of Arabia.

MUZAFFAR H. MALIK

Former Chief Judge,

Northern Areas Chief Court

Islamabad

Opinion

Editorial

PIA’s privatisation
Updated 01 Jul, 2026

PIA’s privatisation

THE management control of PIA has finally been transferred to a consortium comprising private investors and the ...
Rights beyond rulings
01 Jul, 2026

Rights beyond rulings

THE Supreme Court’s recent ruling that jewellery, bridal gifts and dowry articles given to a bride remain her...
Asia left behind
01 Jul, 2026

Asia left behind

ALARMING regression has been witnessed in the Asian teams at the FIFA World Cup. A record nine representatives from...
Resurgent threat
Updated 30 Jun, 2026

Resurgent threat

THE message from Islamabad to Kabul seems to be clear: any act of terrorism inside Pakistan found to be linked to...
Unchecked powers
30 Jun, 2026

Unchecked powers

THERE is little disagreement that Punjab needs stronger tools to combat organised crime, habitual offenders and...
Patriot Pass
30 Jun, 2026

Patriot Pass

IT must be a shared humanity that has bonded the ‘leader of the free world’ so closely with his counterparts in...