Pardoned PCO judges

Published November 15, 2009

IT is all very fine that PCO judges who offered unconditional apologies have been admitted to the court's indulgence and the contempt notices recalled.

But one question that agitates all thinking minds is whether it would be appropriate for some of them after pardon to continue holding high judicial offices which they wangled or were bestowed on post-retirement as the government's bounty.

Clearly, in the case of PCO judges it was no ordinary contempt, consisting in non-compliance of a court's process, obstructing 'justice'.

Here is an altogether different genre, an unmitigated institutional betrayal or veritable defection by some gnomes of the highest judiciary in aid of generalissimo's hubristic coup de main to zap the Constitution for nothing nobler than lucre or lure of office.

The way they went grovelling under the table in front of the Lord Protector, apart from disgracing them, had serious knock-on effects to the point of shaking the very foundation of the polity.

They first unabashedly defied the court when they found it profitable to defy and then were no laggards to apologise when it came to save their bacon.

This is opportunism par excellence; and to me an uncanny reminder of abominable 'simony' being practised in mediaeval ecclesiastical Europe where pardons and benefices were bought and sold.

True, most of the contemnors, who in some cases still had many years to go, had to buy their pardon by seeking premature retirement which by itself is punishment enough.

But what about others who have not taken a similar knock? To let them remain ensconced in their new-fangled offices on the presumption that the court's pardon has bleached them through and through is a postulate one cannot reconcile with. For, there is certainly something about chastised contemnors holding high judicial offices which is not kosher, technical niceties aside.

Pardon in any case can at best save the contemnors from the punitive arm of law but cannot purge them of the stench of a festering moral stigma which by its pungency will ever neutralise all the perfumes of Arabia.

MUZAFFAR H. MALIK

Former Chief Judge,

Northern Areas Chief Court

Islamabad

Opinion

Editorial

Digital growth
Updated 25 Apr, 2024

Digital growth

Democratising digital development will catalyse a rapid, if not immediate, improvement in human development indicators for the underserved segments of the Pakistani citizenry.
Nikah rights
25 Apr, 2024

Nikah rights

THE Supreme Court recently delivered a judgement championing the rights of women within a marriage. The ruling...
Campus crackdowns
25 Apr, 2024

Campus crackdowns

WHILE most Western governments have either been gladly facilitating Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza, or meekly...
Ties with Tehran
Updated 24 Apr, 2024

Ties with Tehran

Tomorrow, if ties between Washington and Beijing nosedive, and the US asks Pakistan to reconsider CPEC, will we comply?
Working together
24 Apr, 2024

Working together

PAKISTAN’S democracy seems adrift, and no one understands this better than our politicians. The system has gone...
Farmers’ anxiety
24 Apr, 2024

Farmers’ anxiety

WHEAT prices in Punjab have plummeted far below the minimum support price owing to a bumper harvest, reckless...