Supreme_Court_AFP_7_670
Supreme Court of Pakistan. — Photo by AFP/File

ISLAMABAD: During Monday’s hearing of the case pertaining to implementation of the Flood Commission’s report, the Supreme Court directed the federal government and all provincial chief secretaries to ensure implementation of every recommendation made in it, DawnNews reported.

A three-member bench of the apex court, headed by Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, heard the case.

Furthermore, the court also issued a notice to Marvi Memon, a former Pakistan Muslim League – Quaid (PML-Q) legislator currently associated with the Pakistan Muslim League – Nawaz (PML-N), to appear in court for the upcoming hearing of the case.

Memon, who had requested the court in Sept 2011 to order the revival of the commission with a view to determining if the government had failed to carry out its recommendations, is expected to review the report during the next hearing.

During the hearing, the chief justice inquired from Sindh’s additional advocate general as to why the commission’s report had not been made public. He added that damages had been estimated at Rs 855 billions, whereas 85 lives had been lost.

Chief Justice Iftikhar further said that destruction had not been prevented and no one had been held to account for it.

The chief justice further inquired regarding the measures taken to obstruct the flow of the rivers, adding that nothing had been done to alleviate the excesses.

He added that the Punjab government was bore more responsible for not obstructing the flow of the rivers as all rivers pass through the province.

The chief justice asked why low-lying areas had not been cleared of the water, adding that not taking action may result in a loss of lives. He further said innocent lives must not be put at stake to satisfy political interests.

A representative of the Sindh Irrigation Department told the court that 25 per cent of the encroachments in low-lying areas had been cleared.

Moreover, the chief justice said a Google Earth satellite image should also be submitted as proof that the encroachments had been removed.

The court directed the federal government and all provincial chief secretaries to ensure implementation of every recommendation made in the commission’s report.

Subsequently, the hearing was adjourned for three weeks.

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...