WASHINGTON: Fighting terrorism in Pakistan is an unfinished business and the United States is not walking away from this responsibility, says the outgoing US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Addressing a global audience via a satellite link, she insisted that improving ties between India and Pakistan was the best way of defeating terrorism in that region.

The issue of Pakistan-based terrorists was raised by an Indian journalist, Burkha Dutt, who reminded Secretary Clinton that when she addressed a town hall meeting in Kolkata, she promised to do her best to defeat terrorism in Pakistan.

Mrs Clinton noted that the efforts that both Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and President Asif Ali Zardari had made to improve communication, business, trade and commerce between their countries would also help create “a more receptive environment” for dealing with these serious threats.

“So of course, I’m not satisfied. As I told you in Kolkata, I believe going after terrorism is an obligation of every country, everywhere, every sensible person. We can have disagreements, but they cannot be in any way using violence or condoning the use of violence,” said the top US diplomat.

Opinion

Editorial

Impending slaughter
Updated 07 May, 2024

Impending slaughter

Seven months into the slaughter, there are no signs of hope.
Wheat investigation
07 May, 2024

Wheat investigation

THE Shehbaz Sharif government is in a sort of Catch-22 situation regarding the alleged wheat import scandal. It is...
Naila’s feat
07 May, 2024

Naila’s feat

IN an inspirational message from the base camp of Nepal’s Mount Makalu, Pakistani mountaineer Naila Kiani stressed...
Plugging the gap
06 May, 2024

Plugging the gap

IN Pakistan, bias begins at birth for the girl child as discriminatory norms, orthodox attitudes and poverty impede...
Terrains of dread
Updated 06 May, 2024

Terrains of dread

Restored faith in the police is unachievable without political commitment and interprovincial support.
Appointment rules
Updated 06 May, 2024

Appointment rules

If the judiciary had the power to self-regulate, it ought to have exercised it instead of involving the legislature.