razarabbani_app-670
Senator Raza Rabbani. — Photo by APP/File

ISLAMABAD: Senator Mian Raza Rabbani on Monday, while speaking during a Senate session, said the demand of consulting judiciary and the armed forces on formation of the caretaker setup was unconstitutional.

Speaking on a point of order, he said the caretaker government could only be installed in consultation with all political stakeholders under the article 223 of the constitution.

The Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) leader said that if army and judiciary are consulted for caretaker government formation, it would be a violation of the constitution as army's oath does not allow it to take part in politics.

“Under the principle of trichotomy of powers, the judiciary could not be consulted either,” he added.

“Moreover, if judiciary is consulted, no court would be able to hear any writ petition against the caretakers as the judiciary would be a party in caretaker's nomination”, said the senator.

Commenting on recently staged “long march” by Dr Tahirul Qadri, Rabbani said that efforts were on to stem the supremacy of the parliament. He said the ‘revolution’ never came about but this would not be the last attempt to derail the democratic process in the country.

After the 18th and 20th amendments, role of the ‘ruling elites’ in formation of election commission and caretaker government has come to an end, he said.

The senator was hopeful that the elected government will complete its term and a peaceful transition will be made.

Rabbani said the demand to dissolve the ECP was aimed at seeking some influence of the elites to steal the elections as was the practice in the past. But, the article 213 has blocked this possibility, he added.

Article 215 of the constitution makes it clear that the chief election commissioner could only be removed through article 209 and the supreme judicial council could remove the CEC, he explained.

Moreover, the PPP senator also said the demand for verification of candidates' nomination papers in 30 days was absurd, saying it was against the law. “This is against article 62 and 63 of the constitution,” he added.

Chairman Senate Nayyar Hussain Bokhari, however, said that the matter could not be debated on mere assumption.

Opinion

Editorial

Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...
Privatisation divide
Updated 14 May, 2024

Privatisation divide

How this disagreement within the government will sit with the IMF is anybody’s guess.
AJK protests
14 May, 2024

AJK protests

SINCE last week, Azad Jammu & Kashmir has been roiled by protests, fuelled principally by a disconnect between...
Guns and guards
14 May, 2024

Guns and guards

THERE are some flawed aspects to our society that we must start to fix at the grassroots level. One of these is the...