Alert Sign Dear reader, online ads enable us to deliver the journalism you value. Please support us by taking a moment to turn off Adblock on

Alert Sign Dear reader, please upgrade to the latest version of IE to have a better reading experience


Army, judiciary may be consulted on interim govt: Fazl

Published Jan 18, 2013 01:49am


Your Name:

Recipient Email:

JUI-F chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman. — File photo

LAHORE: Chief of Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam-F (JUI-F) Maulana Fazlur Rehman on Thursday said there was no harm if military and judiciary were taken on board in discussions on formation of an interim government.

“Although it is not mandatory under the Constitution, there seems to be no problem in taking the judiciary and military on board on the matter,” he said in reply to questions put up by journalists during a press conference at central office of the South Asia Free Media Association (Safma).

Commenting on the demands of Tehrik-i-Minhajul Quran (TMQ), he said he was yet to understand what Dr Tahirul Qadri actually wanted.

“His demand to dissolve the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) is wrong. When even Supreme Court cannot dissolve it then how can the government?”

Dr Qadri was demanding electoral reforms but the process had already been made transparent with the collective efforts of all political forces, including the JUI-F, he said.

The Maulana avoided naming any institution which might be backing the TMQ when questioned about the role of military on the issue. But he said the work being done by Dr Qadri couldn’t be managed without meaningful and effective support. He said none of the political or religious parties were supporting the TMQ and criticised Dr Qadri for keeping mum when the NRO was being introduced during the Musharraf regime.

The TMQ leader was giving an impression as if he enjoyed the support of the military or judiciary, he alleged.

The JUI-F chief said the decision to bring Balochistan under governor rule was unwise but still demanded its replication in Sindh and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa where, according to him, the situation was far more serious.

Tension at the Line of Control was among the new problems being faced by the country.

“Military leadership must tackle the LoC issue without affecting the on-going efforts of maintaining peace between the two countries,” he said adding that he had already asked the Indian leadership to foil any bid which could affect determination of the two countries to resolve various issues.

Talking about giving the MFN status to India, Maulana Rehman said the Islamic Ideology Council had asked the quarters concerned to brief it on this issue. He asked the government to resolve this issue before initiating trade with India under the MFN status.

Earlier, Imtiaz Alam urged the two countries to resolve the LoC issue by taking confidence-building measures.


Your Name:

Recipient Email:

Comments (2) Closed

saleem Jan 18, 2013 09:05am
this guy is soooooooooo goofy when Qadri was saying the same thing he was opposing and now asking the same thing
r.s.soni Jan 18, 2013 10:40am
sir, constitution has three independent organs parliament, executive and judiciary. does judiciary consult executive while delivering judgement.? army is subordinate to the defense minister that is executive. why should executive consult his subordinate.? does kyani consult his subordinates while issuing instructions? , no. so why should executive consult army.? i feel those who say consult army and judiciary they are harboring ambitions to become head of the care taker government and start cleansing politics like bangladesh care taker government instead of conducting elections and carry on for for 4 or 5 years. take lessons from bangladesh supreme court ruling to do away with care taker government concept.