Alert Sign Dear reader, online ads enable us to deliver the journalism you value. Please support us by taking a moment to turn off Adblock on

Alert Sign Dear reader, please upgrade to the latest version of IE to have a better reading experience


SC can’t monitor NAB probe, says Bokhari

Published Jan 17, 2013 10:03pm


Your Name:

Recipient Email:

NAB Chairman Admiral (retd) Fasih Bokhari. — Photo by AFP/File

ISLAMABAD: The hearing of the rental power projects case in Courtroom-1 turned out to be a battle of words and wits on Thursday as the National Accountability Bureau tried to hold firm in the face of insistence by the Chief Justice that the Supreme Court could monitor the progress of investigation in cases.

The back and forth continued throughout the day without much legal progress but towards the end a dramatic scene ensued when a NAB official stood up and asked the Chief Justice that he himself should quit, instead of asking the bureau’s officers to resign.

“You are saying that I should be removed but I say you should be removed,” exploded NAB’s Additional Prosecutor General Rana Zahid Mehmood while pointing towards Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry who was heading the three-judge bench.

At the outset of the proceedings the court asked about the arrest of the accused in the RPP cases, including Prime Minister Raja Pervez Ashraf, but the order issued late in the afternoon before adjourning the hearing till Jan 23 included no directive in this regard.

It asked NAB Chairman Admiral (retd) Fasih Bokhari to provide a comprehensive report on the investigation in all the RPP cases.

It was a report by the additional prosecutor general which irritated the court most.

“This amounts to an outright overturning of the March 30, 2012, judgment in the RPP case,” the chief justice said, adding that had he been the NAB chairman he would have removed the prosecutor.

Rana Zahid had categorically stated in his report that NAB had not found convincing evidence sufficient to file references based on two RPP cases submitted by the Rawalpindi office.

When members of the bench were about to leave the courtroom after concluding the hearing, he stood up to explain his position but in the process lost his temper and ended up hurling aggressive remarks against the chief justice.

The chief justice, however, kept his calm and simply suggested to him not to become so personal.

“You have made us dysfunctional and abuse us every day,” the additional prosecutor general said, adding that he had earlier been kicked out of a high court and “now you are saying I should be removed again from NAB”.

“You have been dysfunctional twice, you should know how it hurts. Only God can take me out of this world.”

Earlier, the NAB chairman asked the court to call him Admiral Bokhari and not Mr Bokhari. “Kindly show me the respect as I am giving you the same,” he said, adding that he was fully cooperating with the court.

“Sorry, Admiral Bokhari,” retorted the chief justice, seemingly in a sarcastic tone.

About the RPP case, the chairman said he never monitored or interfered in the investigation process and left it to the investigators. He said he was the chairman and not an investigator.

Explaining why cases had not been finalised against the accused, he said the primary task of the bureau was to recover the plundered money which was being done, with some residual payments still coming since some organisations differed over the amounts involved.

The next step, he said, would be to determine the criminality against the accused, including the ministers involved in the matter, for which the investigating teams had to go through a lot of evidence to substantiate the allegations. “The process is ongoing,” he assured the court.

About the reason for not filing references as recommended by the regional office, the chairman said two inquiries had been put up before the NAB executive board but “we felt that the inquiry was not complete to the extent that a final shape could be given to the references”.

Justice Gulzar Ahmed said the recovery of money and initiation of cases against the accused should have been done simultaneously since the evidence could be destroyed by the influential accused.

The chairman said he deliberately separated the two procedures to get the money back.

He said he possessed certain secret information but would not divulge it in the open court since it could alert the accused.

He assured the court that references would be filed in due course against the culprits and that he would not allow any interference in the investigation by any political entity.

The chairman also expressed his surprise over how an interim report had ended up in the court, saying the premature report had created confusion and it was a violation of NAB’s standard operating procedures. He wondered how information from the internal files was reaching the court.

About the removal of three officers, he said he had deduced that they had not been performing up to the expectation of the apex court because they were facing contempt of court charges.

Prosecutor General K.K. Agha requested the court to allow him to argue that it had no jurisdiction to supervise NAB investigations but the bench cited the examples of the Haj scam and Bank of Punjab cases and the Tehelka case in India.


Your Name:

Recipient Email:

Comments (7) Closed

Ahmed Jan 18, 2013 04:54am
God help Pakistan, these are teething problems. CJ should not go over board. there are other respectful people in Pakistan
Ram Jan 18, 2013 02:42am
Too much too bad...Now revolt against CJ finally. Beaurocracy is backbone and make or mar.
Najam Saeed Jan 18, 2013 07:00pm
Hats off to Admiral Bokhari and Additional Prosecutor General for standing up to a very abusive and self-righteous CJ and the SC. I am not sure what CJ
Naeem Jan 18, 2013 06:26pm
This is true in the case of Pakistan. When you push someone against the wall he will react like that of the Prosecutor General. He has been abused and categorically removed from the office. That's why he knows how it hurts. Beside, modesty in every action should be the top priority of every official. Unfortunately, in Pakistan when any person or the institution becomes independent or enjoys autonomy, it becomes corrupt e.g. Military, Media. Therefore, its not a good omen for the country that its basic pillars(institutions) indulge in encroachment upon the territories of each other. Given the state of the fragile and infant democratic system, all building blocks should move in right direction so that their every move is meant to stabilize the system.
Hamid Jan 18, 2013 09:09am
Admiral Bokhari earned the title and he is entitled to use it as he wants. He is ex Naval Chief he is not asking court to call Ex CNS but Admiral. He deserves respect same like CJ commands respect. NAB Chairman is not higher post than CNS (Chief of Naval Staff). Give respect and get respect should be the norm.
Irfan Jan 18, 2013 03:06am
Highly despicable of the NAB chairman to blatently show his contempt towards civilians and civil titles and appelations. Hats off to the chief justice on his patience and dignified composure. The ex-"Admiral" simply made a fool of himself. May I remind Bokhari (he doesnt deserve the honour of being addressed as Mr- translated as Janab in our national language) that he no longer commands the fleet. Sensable people like Mr Colin Powell, ex US secretary of state preffered to be addressed as Mr Powel, not Gen. Powell as he had been eleveated to a higher civilian position. Perhaps Bokhari doent deserve the eleviated status of Chairman NAB. Come out of your contempt and hatred towards civilians ex-admiral!
bilal Jan 18, 2013 09:24am
CJP's unconstitutional exceitment resulted in a crash in Karachi Stock market. Billions lost in a few days. Who will be responsible for that?