8-supreme-court-new-670x3501
Supreme Court of Paksitan. — File photo

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Thursday deferred proceedings for an indefinite period on a plea questioning the role of media in the aftermath of the May 2, 2011 incident.

A three-member bench of the apex court, comprising Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Justice Gulzar Ahmed and Justice Sheikh Azmat Saeed, advised the counsel for Sardar Muhammad Ghazi, a petitioner and former attorney general, to consider certain aspects of his plea and adjourned the hearing.

During the course of the proceedings, the chief justice observed that the judiciary would not allow anything against the integrity of the country and its national security.

The bench also questioned the objectives behind the petitioner's plea.

Raja Muhammad Irshad, counsel for the petitioner, contended that the media had defamed the country's security agencies in the aftermath of the Abbottabad operation that killed Osma bin Laden.

The bench told him that if he was aggrieved against any media personnel, he should file a defamation case.

The bench also stopped him from reading a statement of Pakistan's former ambassador to the United States, Husain Haqqani, which was submitted before the commission probing the Abbottabad operation.

Opinion

Editorial

Impending slaughter
Updated 07 May, 2024

Impending slaughter

Seven months into the slaughter, there are no signs of hope.
Wheat investigation
07 May, 2024

Wheat investigation

THE Shehbaz Sharif government is in a sort of Catch-22 situation regarding the alleged wheat import scandal. It is...
Naila’s feat
07 May, 2024

Naila’s feat

IN an inspirational message from the base camp of Nepal’s Mount Makalu, Pakistani mountaineer Naila Kiani stressed...
Plugging the gap
06 May, 2024

Plugging the gap

IN Pakistan, bias begins at birth for the girl child as discriminatory norms, orthodox attitudes and poverty impede...
Terrains of dread
Updated 06 May, 2024

Terrains of dread

Restored faith in the police is unachievable without political commitment and interprovincial support.
Appointment rules
Updated 06 May, 2024

Appointment rules

If the judiciary had the power to self-regulate, it ought to have exercised it instead of involving the legislature.