Supreme Court of Pakistan - File Photo

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Monday appointed two amici curiae to assist it over the issue of president's role in appointment of judges of the superior judiciary, arising out of a pending matter related to Islamabad High Court (IHC) judges.

A five-judge bench comprising Justice Khilji Arif Hussain, Justice Tariq Pervaiz, Justice Ejaz Afzal Khan, Justice Gulzar Ahmed and Justice Sh. Azmat Saeed, took up a presidential reference moved under article 186 of the constitution, invoking its advisory jurisdiction.

The bench nominated Makhdoom Ali Khan, former attorney general for Pakistan and Khawaja Haris, former advocate general Punjab as amici curiae in the case.

About issuance of notice to attorney general of Pakistan, the bench in its order observed that the question whether he could appear in the instant matter, while being a member of the judicial commission, would be determined in next hearing.

It also asked the judicial commission’ secretary to submit minutes of the two meetings over the appointment of IHC judges and also directed the registrar IHC to submit notification regarding appointment of additional judges, Justice Riaz Ahmed Khan and Justice Anwar Kasi.

The bench however, did not accede to a request of Wasim Sajjad, counsel for the referring authority, for sending a recommendation to the chief justice of Pakistan for formation of a larger bench since the issue involved serious constitutional questions.

Akram Shaikh, counsel for a petitioner in the IHC judges appointment case, said that due to non-appointment of judges, the residents of Islamabad had been facing problems.

Justice Ejaz Afzal Khan told him that the propriety demanded that these questions raised in the reference were intrinsically interlinked with the pending issue so these could be decided together while regarding pendency of cases in IHC, they could observe that these should be decided expeditiously.

Justice Tariq Pervaiz told Akram Shaikh that the reference was seeking guidance for future.

Further hearing was adjourned to December 12.

The five-Judge bench was constituted to take up a 31-page presidential reference containing 13 questions related to the role of president, judicial commission and parliamentary committee in appointment of judges of the superior judiciary.

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...