RAWALPINDI, Oct 25: An anti-corruption court here on Thursday transferred to the accountability court a land fraud case in which property tycoon Malik Riaz and his son Ali Riaz are allegedly involved.

The anti-corruption court judge, Shakeel Ahmed, declined the request of the prosecutor general Punjab, Sadaqat Ali Khan, for adjourning the matter till after Eid vacations. The application seeking the case’s transfer had been filed by National Accountability Bureau (NAB).

It is alleged that Malik Riaz, his son and some officials of Bahria Town got 1,401 kanals of land in Azizal and Malkal villages near Rawat transferred in their names through bogus documents. The judge directed the accused persons to appear before the accountability judge on November 8.

It may be recalled that the Lahore High Court (LHC)’s Rawalpindi bench on September 19 had validated an investigation carried out by the Anti-Corruption Establishment into the case. It had also directed the anti-corruption court to decide the application related to the transfer of the case.

The case is based on two FIRs registered by the ACE in 2009 on the complaints of some of the land owners.

Since February 2009, the ACE conducted four inquiries into case. According to the prosecution, the ACE in the earlier inquiries had exonerated the property tycoon, his son and senior officials of Bahria Town. However, during the hearing of the bail petition of one of the accused persons in the Supreme Court on May 23, 2011, it was pointed out that the ACE had exonerated the influential beneficiaries and booked the less important persons.

Later, on the direction of the apex court, the director general ACE constituted a four-member team to investigate the matter, said the prosecution. The team in its report submitted to the Supreme Court in September 2011 nominated Malik Riaz, his son Ali Riaz as well as 14 other influential persons as accused in the land fraud case.

Malik Riaz then filed a petition with the LHC for the quashment of the inquiry but when the court summoned him, he submitted another application to the Supreme Court.

The apex court, while granting him interim bail, directed him to appear before the trial court but he did not, and withdrew the petition from the LHC, the prosecution said.

In the meanwhile, the prosecution pointed out, the incumbent chairman NAB Admiral (retired) Fasih Bokhari took charge of his office in October last year and issued orders for transfer of the case to NAB.

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...