An aerial view from an army rescue helicopter shows the remote flood-affected Pakistani town Dera Alayar on August 15, 2010. Experts have warned that Pakistan's flood forecasting system is flawed. – File photo by AFP
The US media, however, had accurately pointed out that for the third consecutive year, Pakistan was experiencing major seasonal flooding that, while not as severe as that of 2010 and 2011, had resulted in more than 430 deaths and had affected nearly 4.8 million people with deteriorated living conditions.    – File photo by AFP

WASHINGTON: The US Agency for International Development has moved quickly to reject a report, which started a new round of Pakistan bashing in the American media, with some outlets calling Pakistanis ungrateful.

The media report claimed that the US assistance to Pakistan for flood relief exceeded that country’s own spending. They based their claim on a recent report by the Congressional Research Service, misinterpreting the figures cited in this research piece for Congress.

First reported by the Christian Science Monitor, the claim was soon picked up by other US media outlets, pointing out that while the United States was doing so much for the country, Pakistanis continued to hate America.

But Ben Edwards, a spokesman at the USAID, told US National Public Radio, which also reported the claim, that they were wrong. “The government of Pakistan has pledged $91 million specifically for flood relief.

“USAID has pledged $134.6 million for humanitarian assistance to Pakistan, but only a fraction of that money is for flood relief,” Mr Edwards said.

“I don’t have the exact figure for flood relief, but it’s more like $100, 000,” he added.

Comparing US assistance with the Pakistani government’s relief funds, he said, was like comparing “apples and oranges, which creates an inaccurate portrayal of our assistance”.

The US media, however, had accurately pointed out that for the third consecutive year, Pakistan was experiencing major seasonal flooding that, while not as severe as that of 2010 and 2011, had resulted in more than 430 deaths and had affected nearly 4.8 million people with deteriorated living conditions.

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...