BRUSSELS: The European Union looked condemned to months of bitter infighting over money, budgets and the euro on Friday night following a summit where leaders merely papered over the deep divisions between them.

While claims of victory were routine and ubiquitous, the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, appeared highly satisfied with the minimalist outcome, which failed to resolve any issues of substance and shelved some big decisions until December.

The main issues revolved around new regimes and institutions to help stabilise the euro in the longer term by enabling the use of bailout funds to shore up weak banks directly, as well as putting the eurozone’s banks under a new single supervisory agency, the European Central Bank.

While the leaders decided to agree the legal framework on the new banking supervisor by January during a fraught session that dragged on until after 3am on Friday, all other substantial and highly contested matters were left largely untouched.

With the pressure from the financial markets on the euro and on the borrowing costs of weak single currency members relatively low, it appeared that EU leaders felt less need to take bolder decisions.

If the January deadline is met — a big if, given the web of complex and controversial issues entailed in designing an effective banking supervisor for the eurozone while meeting the objections of the 10 countries not in the currency — it will then take several months at least for the supervisory authority to be functioning.

That, in turn, means that it will be at least a year before the eurozone can tackle the sovereign debt crisis more fundamentally by pouring bailout funds directly into ailing banks without first lending to governments and worsening their debt burdens.The decision to take this action came in June at a previous summit but became swiftly engulfed in confusion and dispute. The meeting on Thursday and Friday failed to dispel the confusion.

All the signs were that, barring a re-eruption of the crisis in the markets, substantial eurozone action would have to wait until after Merkel seeks re-election for a third term in September next year. President Francois Hollande of France, who went to the summit with an anti-Berlin agenda, accusing Merkel of being too guided in her crisis management by domestic German politics, said she had her own deadline for euro crisis action — 13 September 2013, the German general election.

Merkel denied this utterly. “I hadn’t even thought of that. That’s just not right,” she said.

But Jean-Claude Juncker, the prime minister of Luxembourg, confirmed that the creation of the new safety and rescue regime for eurozone banks was likely to take a while.

“The detailed questions of what should be done how, when and by whom will be tackled in the course of 2013 — I hope in the first quarter, but it can get dragged into autumn.”

Merkel also left herself plenty of wriggle-room for delays: “There are complicated questions to clarify and we’ll see in December if we complete it or not.”

The summit featured the first big clash in the three-year crisis between Germany and France, highlighting how the troubles over the single currency and sovereign debt have moved to the very heart of the EU.

Hollande’s key aim was to speed up the establishment of the new banking regime, while Merkel emphasised “quality over speed” as part of her delaying tactics.

The result was a compromise that favoured the French on the timeline, but Merkel on the substance.

Arguably the biggest loser was Spain, the biggest worry in the eurozone, as it became clear that it would not benefit in the foreseeable future from the direct bank recapitalisation, which may not kick in now until 2014.

Spanish diplomats told the French news agency AFP that they had given up hope of being able to tap the bailout fund for the banks without having the loans put on the government books, adding to Spain’s debt level.

Merkel made clear that any direct bank recapitalisation, if and when it is allowed, would not be retroactive and could only be applied for future contingencies. Hollande had tried and failed to have the policy made retroactive.

By arrangement with the Guardian

Opinion

Four hundred seats?

Four hundred seats?

The mix of divisive cultural politics and grow­th-oriented economics that feeds Hindu middle-class ambition and provides targeted welfare are key ingredients in the BJP’s political trajectory.

Editorial

Weathering the storm
Updated 29 Apr, 2024

Weathering the storm

Let 2024 be the year when we all proactively ensure that our communities are safeguarded and that the future is secure against the inevitable next storm.
Afghan repatriation
29 Apr, 2024

Afghan repatriation

COMPARED to the roughshod manner in which the caretaker set-up dealt with the issue, the elected government seems a...
Trying harder
29 Apr, 2024

Trying harder

IT is a relief that Pakistan managed to salvage some pride. Pakistan had taken the lead, then fell behind before...
Return to the helm
Updated 28 Apr, 2024

Return to the helm

With Nawaz Sharif as PML-N president, will we see more grievances being aired?
Unvaxxed & vulnerable
Updated 28 Apr, 2024

Unvaxxed & vulnerable

Even deadly mosquito-borne illnesses like dengue and malaria have vaccines, but they are virtually unheard of in Pakistan.
Gaza’s hell
Updated 28 Apr, 2024

Gaza’s hell

Perhaps Western ‘statesmen’ may moderate their policies if a significant percentage of voters punish them at the ballot box.