CJ_File_670
Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry. — File photo

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court has conveyed to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs that Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry had expressed his inability to receive the UN Working Group visiting the country presently on enforced missing persons.

Through a letter dated 10.9.2012 of this court, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs was informed that as the cases of missing persons were pending before the Supreme Court, therefore, propriety demanded that the chief justice may not discuss the matter which was sub judice.

“Therefore, regrets were conveyed to the Ministry expressing the inability of the Honourable Chief Justice of Pakistan to receive the UN Delegation,” the letter stated.

The mandate of the UN team that arrived on Sunday is to collect data about the ‘missing’ persons.

During its 10-day mission undertaken at the invitation of the government, the UN Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances will study the measures adopted by Pakistan to prevent and eradicate enforced disappearances and issues related to truth, justice and reparation for the victims.

The delegation, comprising Olivier de Frouville, the Chair-Rapporteur, and Osman El Hajjé, member, was being accompanied by members of the secretariat of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.

The delegation was scheduled to visit various parts of the country and meet officials, representatives of civil society organisations and UN agencies and relatives of disappeared people.

The working group was set up by the UN Commission on Human Rights in 1980 to assist families in determining the fate and whereabouts of disappeared relatives. It endeavours to establish a channel of communication between the families and the governments concerned, to ensure that individual cases are investigated, with the objective of clarifying the whereabouts of persons who, having disappeared, are placed outside the protection of law. A final report on the mission will be presented to the UN Human Rights Council next year. — APP/DawnNews

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...