Drone strikes

Published May 30, 2012

EVEN as Pakistan and the US try to negotiate their way into a workable relationship, American drone strikes continue. The last few days have seen a flurry of attacks, with five strikes following the Nato summit at which the two countries failed to reach a deal on Isaf supply routes. Coming after Pakistani lawmakers called for their “immediate cessation”, this is a snub that implies America respects neither Pakistan’s sovereignty nor the democracy it claims it wants to see flourish. More pragmatically, the continuing attacks are making progress on the relationship that much more difficult. Parliament’s position could have been taken as a starting point from which to bargain. Pakistan has recognised the value of drone strikes in taking out some of its own enemies. A coordinated mechanism could be worked out in which Pakistan is given a role in the programme — which should also help minimise civilian casualties — in exchange for a promise not to disrupt strikes that target known militants. But as long as drone attacks remain a bone of contention between the two governments, continuing them only makes it harder to move forward with negotiations and gives Pakistani hardliners reason not to support a rapprochement and to incite already inflamed anti-Americanism. This isn’t just a matter of a few hundred people protesting in the streets; it constricts the space available for parliament and the government to talk to the US.

Reports emerging from within the US administration indicate that it is not just Pakistanis who question these attacks. The outgoing ambassador to Pakistan, Cameron Munter, appears to have disapproved of the handling of the programme here, and the Western media had earlier reported that the State Department is not as enthusiastic about it as the CIA. And despite reports that President Obama himself approves many targets, in Pakistan drones also seem to hit those simply found in suspicious locations or around known militants. The tool is a deeply controversial one, and proceeding with disregard for Pakistani opinion will only make it more difficult to incorporate it into a functional US-Pakistan relationship.

Opinion

Editorial

Dangerous law
Updated 17 May, 2024

Dangerous law

It must remember that the same law can be weaponised against it one day, just as Peca was when the PTI took power.
Uncalled for pressure
17 May, 2024

Uncalled for pressure

THE recent press conferences by Senators Faisal Vawda and Talal Chaudhry, where they demanded evidence from judges...
KP tussle
17 May, 2024

KP tussle

THE growing war of words between KP Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur and Governor Faisal Karim Kundi is affecting...
Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...