Babar Awab. - File Photo

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court decided on Thursday to frame contempt charge against former law minister Babar Awan for his media jibe at the judiciary.

Mr Awan and some federal ministers launched a tirade against the apex court at a press conference on Dec 1, 2011, soon after it had ordered an inquiry into the memo scandal by Tariq Khosa and attacked the family of a sitting SC judge for being brother of Mr Khosa.

On March 1, a bench comprising Justice Ejaz Afzal Khan and Justice Athar Saeed reserved its judgment whether to discharge contempt notice or to frame charge against Mr Awan.

“After going though the documentary record and video recording of the press conference, prime facie a case of contempt has been made out against Babar Awan, former law minister and PPP Vice-President, for addressing a press conference at the Press Information Department (PID),” the court said in its order.

Proper contempt proceedings would commence on March 20, it added.

Advocate Ali Zafar, the counsel for Mr Awan, had argued at the last hearing that the dignity of an institution did not rest on punishment.

Courts, he said, should always take a lenient view if a person appeared and tendered an apology.

The former law minister had submitted a written statement expressing regrets over the contents of the press conference and assuring the court that there was no intention or malice to ridicule the judiciary.

It also said that he had the highest respect, honour and regard for the judiciary, and since the bar and bench were part of one chariot, defamation of one would cause a loss to the other.

“If in case there was an impression that he (Mr Awan) in any manner was disrespectful to the judiciary, then being a senior advocate of the court he unreservedly and emphatically submits his regrets and assures the court that there was absolutely neither any intention nor malice at all,” the statement said.

Opinion

Editorial

JAAC ban
Updated 07 Jun, 2026

JAAC ban

Though the JAAC’s demands are open to scrutiny, banning any political organisation — as long as it remains committed to peaceful activism — is undemocratic.
GB election
Updated 07 Jun, 2026

GB election

It is important that whichever party ultimately forms the government puts the needs of the people of GB above everything else.
ODI win
07 Jun, 2026

ODI win

AT last, the Pakistan cricket team had something to celebrate: a One-day International series victory against...
Trump rebuked
Updated 06 Jun, 2026

Trump rebuked

OBSERVERS across the world have long questioned the utility of Donald Trump’s now three-month-old war on Iran. But...
Hostile water motives
06 Jun, 2026

Hostile water motives

INDIA’S latest move to advance the Chenab-Beas Link Tunnel Project and its plan to flush silt from the Salal Dam...
Polio progress
06 Jun, 2026

Polio progress

PAKISTAN’S latest sub-national polio campaign offers encouraging evidence that the country can still push back...