Ambassador Robin Raphel US Coordinator for Economic Development to Pakistan addresses a press conference at residence of US Consul General in Karachi on Monday, November 29, 2010. – Photo by PPI

KARACHI: Washington and donor agencies want Pakistan to honour its commitments on new tax measures.

This was stated by US Coordinator for Economic and Development Assistance to Pakistan Robin Raphel here on Monday at a media briefing on US development initiatives, after interacting with a delegation of Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM), a major coalition partner which is an outspoken opponent of the reformed general sales tax.

She said the Obama administration was trying to convince the Republican dominated-House of Representatives on disbursement of assistance to Pakistan in a transparent manner.

Answering a question about the controversial tax measures, she said that looking at Pakistan’s finances that is 9 per cent of revenue to GDP ratio, the government had to do something to enhance and broaden its revenue collection. “There are lots of ways to do that but Pakistan now has an agreement with the IMF which calls for this reformed GST and since it is our position that countries, whether Pakistan or anybody else, should live up to their international agreements, we would like to see this legislation passed,” Ms Raphel remarked.

“We and all the donors are very keen that Pakistan is able to stay in its arrangement with IMF because that it is very important and will facilitate our argument in the Congress for providing funds for Pakistan,” she said.

About transparency and accountability of disbursement of $7.5 billion aid over five years, she said the US had set up a series of benchmarks and safeguards in each project in order to track the money.

“Before we can provide funds directly to any institution they have to go through a kind of audit by a third party that we retain to see how they do their accounting and see what issues that might be with their practices,” Ms Raphel said.

These measures, she added, were meant to ensure that the funds were going in a special account and were not blended with the budget of the government.

They were retained in a special account whether at the federal, provincial, or the district levels. “So we believe that we can track the fund.” she emphasised.

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...