WASHINGTON, April 23: The Bush administration picked Gen David Petraeus, its top commander in Iraq, on Wednesday to take charge of operations across the Middle East and chose his former No 2 to take over in Baghdad.

The decision to elevate both Petraeus and Lt Gen Raymond Odierno, who together implemented a new military strategy that drove violence down in Iraq, signals that Washington does not plan any major changes in its approach to that war.

It also shows the Pentagon’s desire to apply Petraeus’ experience in fighting insurgencies to Afghanistan, where violence has soared as the Taliban and Al Qaeda regrouped.

US Defence Secretary Robert Gates called Petraeus the most qualified general to lead US Central Command, manage counterinsurgency operations in both wars and face threats such as Islamist extremism throughout the region.

“I don’t know anybody in the United States military better qualified to lead that effort,” Gates said.

President George W. Bush has approved both recommendations and will send the nominations to the US Senate, Gates said.

The White House asked the Senate to approve the nominations quickly, by the end of May, but Gates said he did not expect the changes to take effect until “late summer or early fall.”

If confirmed by the Senate, Petraeus will replace former Adm William Fallon, who resigned after a reported break with the Bush administration over Iran policy.

Central Command is considered the toughest regional military command to lead.

There, Petraeus will oversee US operations in a region that includes Iran, Pakistan and 25 other countries as well as international waters that are both strategically and economically significant, such as the Gulf.

It also includes the Strait of Hormuz, arguably the most prominent choke point in the global crude oil trade, handling more than a third of total water-borne crude oil shipments.

Petraeus will face competing requirements for troops and equipment in Iraq and Afghanistan. He also will be responsible for supporting Pakistan’s counterterrorism efforts and managing rising tensions with Iran.

“Each is at least as important to America’s long-term security as the Iraq conflict, yet the United States does not have as direct a role or as much influence in Iran or Pakistan as it’s had and still has in Iraq,” said Michael O’Hanlon, analyst at the Brookings Institution in Washington.

“And as much of a miracle worker as he’s been in Iraq, it would be unrealistic to expect Gen Petraeus to be able to generate anything close to comparable results with Pakistan or Iran anytime soon,” he said.

When Petraeus arrived in Iraq in February 2007, the country was on the verge of all-out civil war.

Petraeus implemented a new strategy, ordering his troops to leave the relative safety of big bases and to set up smaller outposts with Iraqi forces to better protect the population.—Reuters