US not on warpath with Iran: Rice

Published November 12, 2007

WASHINGTON, Nov 11: Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice denied on Sunday that the United States was bent on war with Iran and renewed an offer of reconciliation talks if the Islamic republic renounces its nuclear drive.

Interviewed on ABC television, Rice was pressed on a Senate resolution passed in September that labelled Iran’s Revolutionary Guards a terrorist operation — a step that critics said had brought war nearer.

She said that President George Bush was clear “that he’s on a diplomatic path where Iran comes into focus.” “Obviously, it can be the case that he will never take his options off the table, but this particular resolution has nothing to do with that from our point of view,” Rice said referring to the prospect of military force on Iran.

“This resolution is saying that there need to be strong measures taken against Iran, which we have definitely done,” she said after the Bush administration announced new sanctions on Iranian groups including the Guards.

Rice spoke a day after President Bush and German Chancellor Angela Merkel discussed diplomatic strategy towards Iran.

The two leaders appear to still differ over when additional sanctions should be imposed on Tehran, with Merkel preferring to wait until European and UN diplomatic efforts have run their course.

“The top of my agenda is Iran,” Bush said as they met on his Texas ranch.

“We will continue to work together to solve this problem diplomatically, which means they will continue to be isolated.” Democratic critics such as presidential contender Barack Obama have said the Senate resolution is a “blank check” for Bush to wage war on Iran, which has refused to bow to international demands to halt its uranium enrichment.

Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney have been using bellicose rhetoric against the Islamic republic, with the president warning of the threat of “World War III” if Iran gains the know-how to make nuclear weapons.

Obama reaffirmed on Sunday that he would “not hesitate” to open talks with Iran, arguing that the Bush administration was “itching to escalate the tensions between Iran and the United States.” “Strong countries and strong presidents speak with their adversaries,” he said on NBC television.

But Rice said the United States and its European allies had already offered Tehran trade and political incentives to stop its enrichment work.

“I’ve even said that we would reverse 28 years of policy,” she said, referring to a US embargo imposed after Iran’s Islamic revolution, and said she would meet her Iranian counterpart “any place, any time, anywhere.” “They just have to give up the fuel cycle, the enrichment and reprocessing that can lead to the technologies that can lead to a nuclear weapon,” Rice said.

It was Iran, not the United States, that was blocking diplomatic progress, she insisted.

“So the question isn’t why will we not talk to Tehran. The question is, why will Tehran not talk to us?”—AFP

Opinion

Editorial

GB polls’ aftermath
Updated 11 Jun, 2026

GB polls’ aftermath

The new administration must address the region’s issues proactively.
Peace in retreat
11 Jun, 2026

Peace in retreat

THE ceasefire announced in April was supposed to create space for negotiations. Instead, it has been repeatedly...
A few good men
11 Jun, 2026

A few good men

IT was a brave move, no doubt. This Tuesday, in the land of the Afghan Taliban, a few good men decided to take a...
Centre vs provinces
Updated 10 Jun, 2026

Centre vs provinces

The reason the centre finds itself in this position is rooted in its failure to expand the tax net and boost revenues.
Party in crisis
10 Jun, 2026

Party in crisis

THE young KP chief minister must be starting to realise just how thorny a seat he occupies. There has been a flurry...
Varsity woes
10 Jun, 2026

Varsity woes

FINANCIAL crises affecting public sector universities across Pakistan are now having an impact on academic...