WASHINGTON, March 23: US tobacco giant Philip Morris was ordered Friday to pay more than 150 million dollars to the family of a deceased smoker who mistakenly believed that low-tar cigarettes would be less addictive and help her avoid cancer.

The verdict, returned by a jury in Portland, Oregon, dealt another blow to the world’s largest tobacco product manufacturer already, which is already beset by multiple legal claims.

The jury found the company was negligent and fraudulent in pitching so-called “light” cigarettes to consumers as a safer product and an alternative to dropping the bad habit.

Philip Morris promised to appeal, saying the decision was “inconsistent with the law and with the facts of the case.”

The wrongful death suit was brought by the widower of Michelle Schwarz, an assistant in her husband’s medical practice, who died of lung cancer in 1999 at the age of 53, after smoking for 35 years.

After several unsuccessful attempts to kick the habit, she switched to Merit cigarettes in 1976 because she believed that low-tar tobacco products were safer and would make it easier for her to achieve her goal.

She never succeeded.

The plaintiff charged that Philip Morris “intentionally made fraudulent misrepresentations about its tobacco products” and, therefore, must pay him more than 300 million dollars in damages.

But while refraining from granting the plaintiff his request in full, the jury found that Philip Morris bore 51 percent of the responsibility for the woman’s death. It thus awarded the plaintiff 168,500 dollars in compensatory and 150 million in punitive damages.

The company rejected the lawsuit as totally groundless.

“There is no such thing as a safe cigarette,” said William Ohlemeyer, vice president and associate general counsel for Philip Morris Companies.

Anti-tobacco activists hailed the decision as a major victory in their crusade against the tobacco industry, which they say is responsible for creating millions of tobacco addicts and ruining the health not only of smokers and those who suffer the effect of exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke.

“This may very well signal a new and important series of cases against Philip Morris and the other major tobacco companies that have long tried to get smokers to switch to low-tar brands rather than quit smoking,” said Attorney Mark Gottlieb, who represents Tobacco Products Liability Project, a civic action group.—AFP

Opinion

Editorial

Budget concerns
Updated 01 Jun, 2026

Budget concerns

Mistaking IMF compliance for sound economic management is what is driving the economy into deeper stagnation.
Gaza’s tragedy
01 Jun, 2026

Gaza’s tragedy

HISTORY may record this as one of the most brazen deceptions of our time. President Donald Trump’s so called Board...
New sports policy
01 Jun, 2026

New sports policy

BETTER sense has prevailed with a new national sports policy set to be rolled out, thus preventing a clash between...
The heat ahead
Updated 31 May, 2026

The heat ahead

Planning for hotter conditions is increasingly becoming a question of public health, economic resilience and public safety.
Dimming hopes
31 May, 2026

Dimming hopes

THE National Assembly opposition leader’s recent warning should give the ruling parties some pause. Once again, ...
No Tobacco Day
31 May, 2026

No Tobacco Day

THIS year’s World No Tobacco Day theme, announced by the WHO last October, is ‘Unmasking the appeal —...