PENNSYLVANIA: Warning that a premature American departure from Iraq would create turmoil throughout the region, President Bush said on Wednesday that his determination to stand firm in Iraq would send a crucial signal to Iran.

“There would be nothing worse for world peace, if the Iranians believed that the United States didn’t have the will and commitment to help young democracies survive,” Bush said. “If we left before the job was done, there would be chaos. Chaos would embolden not only the extremists and radicals who would like to do us harm, but it would also embolden Iran.”

The president’s remarks reflected his view that, beyond establishing order in Iraq after the overthrow of Saddam Hussein, the US mission is to create fertile ground for democracy throughout the region.

Speaking to an audience assembled by the Lancaster County Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Bush also said that he saw no likelihood that direct negotiations with Iran would produce a successful outcome for the United States. And he again warned about the dangers of Iran developing nuclear weapons.

The business group assembled an overwhelmingly friendly audience of about 400 people, who lobbed questions — none with sharp edges — toward the president: How will the farm bill help local farmers? Do you have plans to prevent illegal immigration? Are you supporting any of the current presidential candidates? (That one got a brusque: “No.”)

Such sessions present Bush with the opportunity to work through his talking points before an audience that is a mere 20-minute flight from Andrews Air Force Base and in a Republican community.

Bush spoke in the warehouse of a marketing and distribution company. The only sign of dissent — a rarity for such invitation-only audiences, which are carefully screened — was a woman who sat not far from the president wearing a T-shirt that read: “George Bush. Your war killed my friend’s son.”

The president did not call on her.

As Bush approached the warehouse, he passed about 100 people holding anti war signs. One read: “Worst President Ever.” Nearby, another group held signs supporting him.

Bush and Iran’s president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, were both in New York last week for the opening of the UN General Assembly session. Ahmadinejad was in the audience for Bush’s speech; Bush did not stick around to hear the Iranian president’s address.

Asked by a 10th-grade student why he would not negotiate directly with Iranian leaders, Bush said, “For diplomacy to work, the other side needs as much or more from you as you need from them.”

He has long said that he would not negotiate with Iran until it suspended what the United States maintained was a program to develop nuclear weapons and which Iran says is aimed at civilian nuclear power development. “It’s his choice, not mine anymore,” Bush said of Ahmadinejad and the prospects for negotiations.

The president cited the current experience with North Korea as evidence that standing firm in the face of pressure to negotiate can pay off. He insisted that the United States would sit down with North Korea to discuss its nuclear weapons program only with Russia, China, Japan and South Korea present. And Bush said this approach made clear to North Korea that, with diplomats from Moscow and Beijing there, it was up against traditional allies, as well as Washington, and would face consequences if it did not negotiate.

“Negotiations just for the sake of negotiations oftentimes send wrong signals,” Bush said. “Negotiations to achieve consequences are worth doing.”—Dawn-LAT/WP News Service (c) Los Angeles Times

Opinion

Editorial

GB polls’ aftermath
Updated 11 Jun, 2026

GB polls’ aftermath

The new administration must address the region’s issues proactively.
Peace in retreat
11 Jun, 2026

Peace in retreat

THE ceasefire announced in April was supposed to create space for negotiations. Instead, it has been repeatedly...
A few good men
11 Jun, 2026

A few good men

IT was a brave move, no doubt. This Tuesday, in the land of the Afghan Taliban, a few good men decided to take a...
Centre vs provinces
Updated 10 Jun, 2026

Centre vs provinces

The reason the centre finds itself in this position is rooted in its failure to expand the tax net and boost revenues.
Party in crisis
10 Jun, 2026

Party in crisis

THE young KP chief minister must be starting to realise just how thorny a seat he occupies. There has been a flurry...
Varsity woes
10 Jun, 2026

Varsity woes

FINANCIAL crises affecting public sector universities across Pakistan are now having an impact on academic...