ISLAMABAD: The Isl­amabad High Court (IHC) on Monday restored the bail of journalist Sohrab Barkat in the last remaining case registered against him by the National Cyber Crime Investigation Agency (NCCIA), setting aside a trial court’s order that had cancelled his post-arrest bail.

Justice Arbab Muhammad Tahir heard the petition filed by Barkat challenging the trial court’s decision to revoke his bail.

After hearing arguments, the IHC nullified the impugned order and directed the authorities to release the journalist forthwith, if he is not required in any other case.

Barrister Saad Rasool appeared on Mr Barkat’s behalf, contending that the trial court had erred in cancelling the bail despite compliance with all conditions previously imposed.

Allowing the petition, the high court observed that the order of the trial court could not be sustained and restored Mr Barkat’s bail, effectively clearing the way for his release.

The case against Mr Barkat was registered over accusations of spreading misinformation about state institutions during an interview he conducted.

Published in Dawn, March 3rd, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Makkah agreement
Updated 09 Aug, 2026

Makkah agreement

IN the midst of a gruelling war between the US and Iran — currently at a stalemate — the signing of the Makkah...
Conflicting priorities
09 Aug, 2026

Conflicting priorities

THERE is a reasonable argument that the democratic process must go on regardless of prevailing conditions; that...
FIFA controversy
09 Aug, 2026

FIFA controversy

FIFA PRESIDENT Gianni Infantino is at the centre of a storm of his own making. Even after a crisis meeting in...
Danger ahead
Updated 08 Aug, 2026

Danger ahead

PAKISTAN has already paid a heavy human price this monsoon, even as another dangerous spell approaches. NDMA figures...
Israeli impunity
08 Aug, 2026

Israeli impunity

ANY hope that Hamas’s decision to disarm would lead to a breakthrough has been dashed for one simple reason:...
Flawed investigations
Updated 08 Aug, 2026

Flawed investigations

An inaccurate record of a victim’s wounds hinders the dispensation of justice. Medical examiners in such a critical area cannot cut corners.