Early hearing pleas to go before SC’s principal seat

Published
A file photo of Justice Yahya Afridi. — SC
A file photo of Justice Yahya Afridi. — SC

ISLAMABAD: Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Yahya Afridi on Saturday ordered that if an Advocate-on-Record (AOR) or a litigant (in person), in future, seeks the transfer of a case from any branch registry of the Supreme Court to its principal seat and also wants early fixation, separate applications will have to be filed.

Under the new procedure, a litigant will first file an application for the transfer of the case from an SC branch registry to the principal seat in Islamabad. If the transfer application is allowed, a separate application for early fixation of the same case will then be filed.

However, if an SC bench is available at a branch registry, the litigant may file an application for early fixation at the branch registry, the order clarified.

The order states that whenever a civil or criminal petition is filed at the SC branch registry in Quetta, an option on a specified pro forma will be obtained from the AOR or litigant (in person) as to whether they wish the petition to be heard in Quetta or Islamabad. If the litigant opts for the case to be heard at the principal seat, reasons for the request will be recorded on the option pro forma, which will then be placed before the competent authority for orders.

CJP says separate petitions must for case transfer, urgent hearing

The directions have been issued as a facilitative measure aimed at minimising inconvenience and ensuring timely adjudication. The mechanism is intended to benefit litigants and bar members filing cases at the Quetta branch registry.

The move follows concerns raised by lawyers in Quetta about inconvenience caused by the comparatively limited availability of regular benches at the branch registry due to lower pendency, which often results in difficulties for litigants.

The new arrangement is aimed at providing clarity at the filing stage and enabling more efficient scheduling of cases. It reflects the SC’s commitment to respo­nsive and citizen-centric judicial administration, ensuring that litigants and lawyers from Balochistan have timely, efficient and flexible access to hearings.

Published in Dawn, March 1st, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Rampant lawlessness
Updated 25 Jul, 2026

Rampant lawlessness

THE brutal slaying of a judge and his guard in Mastung is the latest in a series of blood-drenched events that have...
Daily fuel pricing
25 Jul, 2026

Daily fuel pricing

THE government’s move to daily petroleum price adjustments should make fuel pricing more transparent and more...
The drug problem
25 Jul, 2026

The drug problem

WHILE Islamabad Police chase low-level peddlers, the capital’s kingpins have quietly taken their operations ...
A new chokepoint
Updated 24 Jul, 2026

A new chokepoint

WITH free transit of vessels through the Strait of Hormuz blocked due to the US-Iran conflict, a new chokepoint has...
Improved rating
24 Jul, 2026

Improved rating

S&P GLOBAL’S decision to upgrade Pakistan’s long-term sovereign credit rating to ‘B’ with a stable...
More firetraps
24 Jul, 2026

More firetraps

WHILE it was already apparent that death traps dot Karachi, a safety audit by the Sindh government has thrown up...