Congress to weigh extending space station life, NASA moon base

Published February 26, 2026
A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket and Dragon spacecraft lifts off on NASA’s Crew-12 mission to the International Space Station, carrying NASA astronauts Jessica Meir and Jack Hathaway. —Reuters/File
A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket and Dragon spacecraft lifts off on NASA’s Crew-12 mission to the International Space Station, carrying NASA astronauts Jessica Meir and Jack Hathaway. —Reuters/File

A US Senate committee next week will consider extending the planned life of the International Space Station (ISS) by two years to give companies more time to develop a replacement, one of a few changes to a NASA bill focused on rivaling China’s growing footprint in space.

The Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation plans to take up legislation on 4 March that would amend a NASA authorisation bill with the ISS extension, and add a requirement that NASA build a base on the moon’s surface as part of its Artemis programme.

The ISS extension, which has bipartisan backing from the committee’s chair Ted Cruz and ranking member Maria Cantwell, is part of the committee’s focus on rivaling China, as Beijing considers foreign partners on its own Tiangong space station and a 2030 crewed moon landing.

NASA had planned to retire the ISS, which has been in orbit for more than two decades, by 2030. The proposed extension would set its retirement at 2032.

The ISS has sprung small leaks in recent years that the space agency sees as signs of its age, as the US private sector increasingly appears capable of taking over its role.

NASA is funding early company concepts of a commercial-focused replacement, drawing involvement from firms such as Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin and Voyager. But some of those companies have made little progress towards 2030 deployment, raising concerns about a gap in US-crewed activity in low-Earth orbit as geopolitical competition in the domain soars.

The space agency last year tapped Elon Musk’s SpaceX to build a spacecraft that could attach to the ISS and drag it into Earth’s atmosphere for a controlled destruction, opting against preserving it as an orbital landmark to avoid debris risks and potentially costly maintenance.

Adding the requirement for a moon base to NASA’s authorisation would help cement the agency’s desire to establish a long-term presence on the moon, using that experience as practice for future missions to Mars.

SpaceX’s CEO Musk expressed his support for such an architecture earlier this month after previously advocating for a direct-to-Mars space exploration approach.

SpaceX is developing its Starship rocket to serve as a moon lander under NASA’s Artemis programme, alongside Blue Origin’s Blue Moon lander.

NASA has in recent months cultivated an air of competition between the two billionaire-backed space companies to get them to speed up their lunar lander development timelines, as China signals progress in its own lunar programme.

Opinion

Editorial

Hardening lines
Updated 22 May, 2026

Hardening lines

Iranian suspicions about Pakistan’s close ties with Washington and Gulf states persist, while Pakistan remains uneasy over Tehran’s growing engagement with India.
Unliveable city
22 May, 2026

Unliveable city

IN Karachi, when it comes to water, it is every man and woman for themselves. A persistent shortage in available...
Glof alert
22 May, 2026

Glof alert

FOR many communities in northern Pakistan, the sound of heavy rain now carries a different meaning. It is no longer...
External woes
Updated 21 May, 2026

External woes

Relying indefinitely on remittances to offset structural economic weaknesses is not sustainable.
Political activity
21 May, 2026

Political activity

THE opposition is astir. There is talk of widespread protests this Friday over a list of dissatisfactions with the...
Seizing hope
21 May, 2026

Seizing hope

ISRAEL’S tyranny knows no bounds. After intercepting the Global Sumud Flotilla that set sail last week, disturbing...