IHC puts ECP on notice in petition against local government polls withdrawal in Islamabad

Published
0
A file photo of the Election Commission of Pakistan. — AFP/File
A file photo of the Election Commission of Pakistan. — AFP/File

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Monday issued a notice to the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) on a petition filed by Jamaat-i-Islami (JI) challenging the withdrawal of the schedule for local government elections in the federal capital and sought a response by Jan 27.

The matter was heard by Justice Mohammad Azam Khan. During the proceedings, Jamaat-e-Islami Islamabad Ameer Mohammad Nasrullah Randhawa appeared before the court along with his counsel, Advocate Chaudhry Shoaib Ahmed.

The petition challenges the ECP’s notification withdrawing the local government election schedule for Islamabad, contending that the move is unlawful and unconstitutional. The petitioner argued that the last local government elections in the federal capital were held in 2015 and that the five-year constitutional term of the local bodies has long expired.

Counsel for the petitioner submitted that under the law, fresh local government elections are required to be held within 120 days of the completion of the term of local bodies. However, instead of fulfilling this constitutional obligation, the ECP withdrew the already announced election schedule, which is against the law, he added.

The court was informed that the ECP had initially announced the local government election schedule on Dec 9, which was later revised on Dec 26, fixing Feb 15 as the polling day.

However, the schedule was effectively rendered ineffective after the promulgation of the Islamabad Capital Territory Local Government (Amendment) Ordinance 2026 by President Asif Ali Zardari on January 10.

The petitioner contended that the ordinance was promulgated with mala fide intent to delay long-pending local government elections in Islamabad. It was argued that the ordinance was issued after the announcement of the election schedule and just days before the commencement of a National Assembly session, despite the absence of any extraordinary circumstances warranting such a step.

Nasrullah Randhawa submitted that the ordinance was unconstitutional and in violation of Articles 17, 32, 89 and 140-A of the Constitution. He further reminded the court that the IHC had earlier issued directions for holding local government elections in Islamabad, which were not implemented, and that even a contempt petition filed in this regard did not lead to any effective action.

Published in Dawn, January 21st, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Muddled hierarchy
Updated 15 Nov, 2026

Muddled hierarchy

The jurisdiction of the two courts and a mechanism for settling disputes between them should be spelt out in law, not left to judges to fight over.
Growing crisis
15 Nov, 2026

Growing crisis

AN emergency can be judged by the speed with which it draws an effective response. The National Population Council’s...
Organised rackets
15 Nov, 2026

Organised rackets

ON the International Day against Transnational Organised Crime, observed today, Pakistan finds itself in a tight...
Referendum talk
Updated 14 Nov, 2026

Referendum talk

Unless the PPP is deliberately using Sindh as a bargaining chip, it should issue a clarification with a clear, consistent position on new administrative units, not one tailored to protect its home turf.
Mineral wealth
Updated 14 Nov, 2026

Mineral wealth

Minerals should not be presented as a solution to Pakistan’s long-term economic difficulties. The aim should be to build an industrial base rather than export raw materials.
Late diagnosis
14 Nov, 2026

Late diagnosis

AS we mark World Diabetes Day today, Pakistan faces a troubling question: how many people are living with diabetes...