ISLAMABAD: A strike announced by the legal fraternity in Islamabad could not elicit a widespread response as the district courts and the Islamabad High Court, respectively, witnessed more than 70 and 80 per cent attendance on Monday.

The Islamabad Bar Council (IBC), the Islamabad High Court Bar Association (IHCBA) and the District Bar Association issued the strike call to protest the transfer of three judges from the Lahore High Court (LHC), the Sindh High Court (SHC), and the Balochistan High Court (BHC) to Islamabad under Article 200.

On Monday, the representatives of these bodies stood at the court entrances urging their fellow lawyers to boycott the proceedings. It may be noted that in a strike in May last year, lawyers had allegedly tried to stop their colleagues and litigants from entering the court, which prompted a strong response from Justice Babar Sattar who took notice of this practice and issued notices the bar president, Riasat Ali Azad, and the IHC registrar among others.

The security in and around the high court and other courts remained heightened due to the strike against the new judges. However, Justice Sarfraz Dogar and Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro convened their courts whereas Justice Mohammad Asif, who was transferred from the BHC, was on leave.

Lawyers convention

Meanwhile, the lawyers’ representatives held a convention at the District Courts Islamabad. The lawyers opposed the 26th Constitutional Amendment and demanded the cancellation of the upcoming Judicial Commission meeting on February 10. The convention also announced a protest on Constitution Avenue on the same day.

Addressing the gathering, senior lawyers and bar representatives expressed concerns over what they termed as the “conquest” of the judiciary and media through recent constitutional amendments and legislative measures like the Peca Act.

The speakers highlighted that the appointment of judges should be based on merit and not political or institutional influence. Former Supreme Court Bar Association president Amanullah Kinrani said that the recent amendments were orchestrated to serve vested interests rather than judicial integrity. He said, “If today the target is prisoner number 804 (Imran Khan), tomorrow it could be Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari or Nawaz Sharif.”

Published in Dawn, February 4th, 2025

Opinion

Editorial

Sustainable path?
Updated 13 Jun, 2026

Sustainable path?

The FY27 budget is the first clear signal that the government is ready to transition from stabilisation to growth.
Prioritising education
13 Jun, 2026

Prioritising education

THOUGH the improvement in the country’s literacy rate may be slight, as highlighted by the Economic Survey, it ...
Poverty’s rise
13 Jun, 2026

Poverty’s rise

AS attention turns to the government’s plans for the coming fiscal year, one set of figures deserves particular...
A difficult story
Updated 12 Jun, 2026

A difficult story

Unless productivity becomes the dominant target of economic policy, Pakistan will continue to oscillate between crises and fragile recovery.
Rough waters
12 Jun, 2026

Rough waters

AMONGST the key potential triggers for fresh conflict in South Asia is water. The Indian state is behaving in an...
Politicised football
12 Jun, 2026

Politicised football

ALMOST three-and-half years since Lionel Messi led Argentina to FIFA World Cup glory, the latest edition of...