Controversial elections act amendment rushed through NA panel

A meeting of the National Assembly Standing Committee on Parliamentary Affairs on Wednesday. — Committees of NA X
A meeting of the National Assembly Standing Committee on Parliamentary Affairs on Wednesday. — Committees of NA X

• Move aims to provide clarity in law, minister claims
• JUI-F lawmaker believes legislation will weaken assembly
• PTI MNA questions removal of ‘bat’ from ballot

ISLAMABAD: As the government struggles to prevent the emergence of Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf as the single largest party in the National Assembly, a controversial bill seeking to bar the PTI-backed ‘independent’ legislators from joining the party was rushed through the NA Standing Committee on Parliamentary Affairs, on Wednesday.

The committee met a day after the bill was introduced in the assembly by PML-N lawmaker Bilal Azhar Kayani.

“The Election (Second Amendment) Bill 2024” seeks to bar independents from joining a political party at a subsequent stage after the period specified for the purpose in the law, besides restraining political parties from submitting priority list of their candidates for reserved seats after the passage of stipulated timeline.

The bill was passed by 8-4 votes at the meeting held with MNA Rana Iradat Sharif Khan in the chair.

Shahida Akhtar of Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam (Fazl) opted to abstain from voting. She, however, observed that such a legislation would weaken the parliament and criticised the government for bulldozing legislation when it wants.

Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar briefed the committee on the proposed amendment to sections 66 and 106 of the Elections Act 2017 XXXIII of 2017 and insertion of Section 104A in the Act. The amendment aims to provide clarity in the law according to the true spirit of the Constitution, he said.

The minister said that the bill has been designed to explicitly provide for that no independent candidate or candidates shall exercise his/their right to join a political party at a subsequent stage after the period specified for the purpose in the Constitution and Law, and that the consent of an independent candidate once given for joining a political party for the purpose of clause (6) of Article 51 or clause (3) of Article 106 shall be irrevocable.

He said lawmaking is the job of parliament, and courts can only interpret the Constitution. He said parliament can enact a law where it sees its jurisdiction is being encroached upon and the Constitution is being re-written. He said the bill would remove many confusions.

The defence of a private member bill by the law minister surprised PTI’s Ali Muhammad Khan, who sought to know if the government wanted to adopt it.

In response to Mr Ali Muhammad’s remarks, Mr Kayani — who had moved the bill — said a political party which fails to provide the list of its candidates for reserved seats within the legal timeline loses the right to claim these seats. He said if an independent candidate after his victory joins a political party, cannot join another party afterwards.

Sahibzada Sibghatullah asked if it was the decision of the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) or somebody else to deprive the PTI of its poll symbol.

Khurram Shahzad Virk was of the view that the bill was not in the interest of institutions and people of the country.

Mr Ali Muhammad asked under which law the symbol of ‘bat’ was removed from the ballot paper. He also asked why the ECP had recognised PTI after the Supreme Court verdict.

The meeting was attended by MNAs Raja Osama Sarwar, Shaikh Aftab Ahmed, Raja Qamar-ul-Islam, Mahmood Bashir Virk, Saad Waseem, Khurram Virk, Malik Shah, Naveed Aamir, Nikhat Shakeel Khan, Sahibzada Sibghatullah, Ali Muhammad Khan, Hameed Hussain and Shahida Begum.

Minister for Parliamentary Affairs Azam Nazeer Tarar, secretaries of the Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs and ECP, Additional Secretary Mohammed Israr and joint Secretary Muhammad Aslam from the Ministry of Law and Justice and other senior officers also attended the meeting.

Published in Dawn, August 1st, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

Quid pro quo
Updated 26 Jul, 2026

Quid pro quo

Accepting Israel would mean legitimising its violence against the Palestinians, as well as its neighbouring Arab states and Iran.
AI in government
26 Jul, 2026

AI in government

THE Prime Minister’s Office has announced the introduction of an AI-powered digital system and directed ministries...
Cautious optimism
26 Jul, 2026

Cautious optimism

THE latest polio surveillance figures offer some encouraging news regarding the difficult fight against polio. The...
Rampant lawlessness
Updated 25 Jul, 2026

Rampant lawlessness

THE brutal slaying of a judge and his guard in Mastung is the latest in a series of blood-drenched events that have...
Daily fuel pricing
25 Jul, 2026

Daily fuel pricing

THE government’s move to daily petroleum price adjustments should make fuel pricing more transparent and more...
The drug problem
25 Jul, 2026

The drug problem

WHILE Islamabad Police chase low-level peddlers, the capital’s kingpins have quietly taken their operations ...