Move against pension benefits of PAF JCOs assailed in court

Published
0

ISLAMABAD: In line with the government’s ongoing austerity measures, the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) has withdrawn “incentive promotions” for junior commissioned officers (JCOs), a scheme that gives them post-retirement financial benefits.

This decision, effective retrospectively, has sparked legal challenges, with about three dozen former PAF warrant officers (WOs) and assistant warrant officers (AWOs) lodging petitions in the Islamabad High Court (IHC).

The petitions, submitted by retired Brigadier Wasaf Khan Niazi, will likely be taken up by a single-member bench of the IHC later this week. The petitioners argued that they joined the PAF as airmen and, after basic training, worked with total dedication to reach the positions of AWOs and WOs.

One petition said that “during the service, a policy circular was issued whereby those JCOs and NCOs who had fulfilled the promotion criteria of the board but could not be promoted to the next rank for want of vacancy in service structure were to be granted incentive promotion to the next rank for financial effect/pensionary benefits.”

“However, the new rank was not to be worn by such incumbents, nor did it have any effect on the period of service for that rank”, the petition added.

According to the petition, the policy for incentive promotion was amended on May 15, 2021, and the required threshold for this promotion has toughened. However, the petitioners tried their best to achieve the required eligibility.

It said that on July 9, 2023, one of the petitioners attained the age of superannuation, and his case fell within the ambit of policy existing at that time issued under the Air Force Order (AFO) of March 16, 2018.

However, the PAF recently virtually withdrew the incentive promotion for airmen and was not granted to them “in line with the policy”, the petition said.

“When the petitioner approached the authorities through departmental applications, the same was not responded and the organisation remained non-committal about its reasons,” it added.

The petitioners argued that since they attained the age of superannuation before the policy for the incentive promotion was amended, the revised policy could not be implemented retrospectively in their cases.

They also pointed out that since no alternative remedy was available in the PAF Act or Pakistan Air Force Rules, the issue could be settled in a high court.

Published in Dawn, June 4th, 2024

Editorial

Blue wave
Updated 05 Nov, 2026

Blue wave

While Trump does not usually learn from his errors, perhaps seeing the response of the American voters he may attempt a wiser course.
New LPG policy
Updated 05 Nov, 2026

New LPG policy

If the policy is enforced effectively, it could potentially help end shortages and slash prices. But the question remains whether it will.
Polio’s other victims
05 Nov, 2026

Polio’s other victims

FOR decades, Pakistan has vowed to eradicate polio. Billions have been spent on logistics and awareness drives. Yet...
Electoral reform
Updated 04 Nov, 2026

Electoral reform

The real problem is the gulf between the statute book and what happens on polling day, not the laws.
Competing demands
04 Nov, 2026

Competing demands

THE climate crisis is becoming harder to confront as the world develops new ways to consume scarce resources. At an...
Belated meeting
Updated 04 Nov, 2026

Belated meeting

Whether it is Imran Khan, his family members, or other incarcerated political leaders and activists, the state should not deny them their rights.