ISLAMABAD: Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui, a former judge of the Islamabad High Court, on Thursday named a number of retired army generals, as well as some former judges, as parties in the case against his removal.

Senior counsel Hamid Khan, on behalf of the ex-judge, moved an amended application before the Supreme Court to name as respondents in his petition former army chief Qamar Javed Bajwa, former director general of the Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) Faiz Hamid, three retired brigadiers — Irfan Ramay, Faisal Marwat and Tahir Wafai — as well as a former chief justice of the IHC, Anwar Khan Kasi, and a former registrar of the Supreme Court, Arbab Muhammad Arif.

“During the course of proceedings on Dec 14, it has been pointed out that allegations made in the speech and the replies by Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui implicate, directly or indirectly, certain former officers of the Pakistan Army and the Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) and it is just and proper that they be personally impleaded in the instant petition so as to allow them an opportunity of hearing regarding the said allegations prior to any order that may be passed that may directly or indirectly affect them,” the application said, while referrimg to the Supreme Court proceedings.

The amended applications were filed on behalf of Mr Siddiqui and senior counsel Salahuddin Ahmed, representing the Islamabad High Court Bar Association and the Karachi Bar Association.

These applications will now be presented before a five-judge Supreme Court bench, headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Qazi Faez Isa, on Friday to issue notices to the freshly made respondents.

The new list of respondents was submitted to the Supreme Court after the CJP asked the counsel to make these individuals parties to the case.

Otherwise, the CJP said, the court will not hear a single allegation against them.

The CJP observed that it was wrong to malign institutions since no institution was bad.

“Individuals running such establishments should be blamed inst­e­ad,” he stressed.

The Supreme Court was seized with an appeal moved by Mr Siddiqui against an opinion of the Supreme Judicial Council, and an Oct 11, 2018, notification under which he was removed as a superior court judge for a speech he delivered at the District Bar Association, Rawal­pindi, on July 21 of that year.

Published in Dawn, December 15th, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

Unyielding onslaught
Updated 13 Jun, 2024

Unyielding onslaught

SEVEN soldiers paid the ultimate price in Lakki Marwat on Sunday when their vehicle was blown up in an IED attack,...
X diplomacy
Updated 12 Jun, 2024

X diplomacy

Both states can pursue adversarial policies, or come to the negotiating table and frankly discuss all outstanding issues, which can be tackled through dialogue.
Strange decisions
12 Jun, 2024

Strange decisions

THE ECP continues to wade deeper and deeper into controversy. Through its most recent decision, it had granted major...
Interest rate cut
Updated 11 Jun, 2024

Interest rate cut

The decision underscores SBP’s confidence that economic stability is gaining traction.
Rampant zealotry
11 Jun, 2024

Rampant zealotry

Decades of myopic policies pursued by the state have further aided the radicalisation of significant portions of the population.
Cricket breakdown
11 Jun, 2024

Cricket breakdown

THERE was a feeling that Pakistan had finally turned the corner in their T20 World Cup campaign. Sadly, it was only ...