Recently, social media platforms, including Meta (formerly Facebook), have had a significant impact on public discourse and perceptions of the conflict.

Unfortunately, Meta’s handling of disinformation related to Gaza has raised concerns about its impact on truth, objectivity and the potential consequences for the people involved, Anadolu Agency reports.

While users who want to support Israel can do so easily, those who take a pro-Palestinian stance find their accounts banned, censored, or reduced in visibility.

Some have even been declared terrorists. This situation has been expressed by many users and organisations that monitor freedom of expression.

While Meta made it easy to share fabricated content produced to justify Israel’s brutal attacks, it suppressed the posts of Palestinian supporters under some pretexts, such as community rules or some algorithmic errors.

Read the full Op-ed here.

Opinion

Editorial

Holding the line
16 Mar, 2026

Holding the line

PAKISTAN’S long battle against polio has recently produced encouraging signs. Data from the national eradication...
Power self-reliance
Updated 16 Mar, 2026

Power self-reliance

PAKISTAN’S transition to domestic sources of electricity is a welcome development for a country that has long been...
Looking for safety
16 Mar, 2026

Looking for safety

AS the Middle East conflict enters its third week, the war’s most enduring victims are not those who wage it....
Battling hate
Updated 15 Mar, 2026

Battling hate

In the current scenario, geopolitical conflict, racial prejudice and religious bigotry all contribute to the threats Muslims face.
TB drugs shortage
15 Mar, 2026

TB drugs shortage

‘CRIMINAL negligence’ is the phrase that jumps to mind when one considers the disturbing consequences of the...
Chinese diplomacy
Updated 14 Mar, 2026

Chinese diplomacy

THERE are signs that China is taking a more active role in trying to resolve the issue of cross-border terrorism...