PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court on Thursday suspended operation over a case registered in North Waziristan against two former lawmakers and Swat’s tehsil mayor accusing them of sedition and directed the police not to arrest them.

A bench consisting of Justice Ishtiaq Ibrahim and Justice Sahibzada Asadullah issued notice to the respondents including the provincial government, North Waziristan district police officer (DPO) and other officials and also sought record of the case.

The bench fixed Dec 7 for next hearing of a petition jointly filed by the three leaders of Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf, including former MNA Saleemur Rehman, ex-MPA Fazal Hakeem and mayor of Babuzai tehsil (Swat), Shahid Ali Khan, requesting the court to order quashing of the FIR registered at Miramshah police station on Nov 2, 2023.

The FIR was registered on complaint filed by a resident of North Waziristan, Malik Abdullah Zaib, under sections 12-B (criminal conspiracy), 124-A (sedition), 504 (intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace), 505 (statement conducing to public mischief) and 506 (punishment for criminal intimidation) of the Pakistan Penal Code.

The complainant claimed that he was a patriotic citizen and had seen a video on social media wherein the said three leaders were addressing around 200 to 250 workers and were using provocative language.

The complainant alleged that the suspects were saying that they would ‘set Pakistan on fire’ and ‘would not spare army officers and their children’. He claimed that the suspects had tried to provoke general public towards sedition against Pakistan Army and the government.

Advocate Alam Khan Adenzai and Inamullah Yousafzai appeared for the petitioners and contended that they were implicated in a fake case and was based on mala fide intentions.

They argued that the petitioners belonged to Swat and on the same issue first an FIR was registered in Swat, then in South Waziristan and now in North Waziristan.

Published in Dawn, November 24th, 2023

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...