ISLAMABAD: The Centre for Peace and Development Initiatives (CPDI) has called on the government to appoint an information commissioner from the civil society.

The commissioner should be appointed in accordance with the criteria set out in Section 18(c) of the Right of Access to Information Act, 2017with proven expertise in human rights and the right to information, the CPDI said.

In this regard, CPDI had earlier sent a letter to Marriyum Aurangzeb, the Minister of State for Information and Broadcasting, urging her to take necessary steps to ensure that the information commission is constituted with diverse perspectives from different segments of society.

CPDI is a not-for-profit registered civil society organisation working on the issues of Development, Peace and access to information in Pakistan.

“While the government appointed members of Pakistan Information Commission from bureaucracy and judiciary when it appointed Shoaib Siddiqui as Chief Information Commissioner and Ijaz Hussan Awan on January 10, 2023, CPDI believes that the inclusion of a member from civil society in the Information Commission is important to ensure that diverse perspectives from different segments of society are incorporated in the functioning of the Commission.

The Right of Access to Information Act, 2017 requires the government to appoint Information Commissioners through a transparent process in accordance with the criteria set out in the Act, including individuals who have proven experience of working in the area of human rights and right to information,” statement issued by organisation claimed.

“We urge the government to appoint an Information Commissioner who has proven expertise in human rights and the right to information from civil society,” said Mukhtar Ahmad Ali, Executive Director of CPDI.

“This will help ensure that the Information Commission is able to effectively promote transparency and accountability in government operations, as well as protect the fundamental right to information,” he said.

Mukhtar Ahmad also expressed concern over the absence of the third member of the Pakistan Information Commission (PIC), which could adversely impact its functioning. In situations where there is no agreement between the two members, a third member is required as per the law to ensure that there is no tie and decisions on contested issues are made with a majority vote.

“The absence of the third member of the PIC could impede its functioning and compromise the right to information of citizens,” he said.

Published in Dawn, March 29th, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

Peshawar meeting
Updated 16 Jan, 2025

Peshawar meeting

Dealing with Afghan Taliban is necessary not just for internal stability, but to ensure that Afghanistan not isolated regionally.
Cyber circus
16 Jan, 2025

Cyber circus

PAKISTAN’S cybercrime-fighting apparatus is proving rather good at harassing journalists and remarkably poor at...
Anti-abuse action
16 Jan, 2025

Anti-abuse action

IN what is a social minefield for women, the Punjab police investigation department’s decision to deploy 1,450...
Missing justice
Updated 15 Jan, 2025

Missing justice

SC must at least ensure missing persons cases are heard with the urgency they deserve.
Racist talk
15 Jan, 2025

Racist talk

WHEN racist tropes are amplified by the expansive reach of social media, the affected communities face real-world...
Faceless customs
15 Jan, 2025

Faceless customs

THE launch of the faceless customs assessment system as part of the government’s Tax Transformation Plan is a...