VATICAN CITY, Dec 26: Pope Benedict, in his first Christmas address, on Sunday urged humanity to unite against terrorism, poverty and environmental blight and called for a ‘new world order’ to correct economic imbalances.

The Pope made his comments to tens of thousands of pilgrims gathered under umbrellas in a rainy St Peter’s square for his “Urbi et Orbi” (to the city and the world) message and blessing.

In his address, telecast live from the central balcony of St Peter’s Basilica to tens of millions of people in nearly 40 countries, he also urged his listeners not to let technological achievements blind them to true human values.

He said humanity should look to the Christ for encouragement in times of difficulty and fear.

“A united humanity will be able to confront the many troubling problems of the present time: from the menace of terrorism to the humiliating poverty in which millions of human beings live, from the proliferation of weapons to the pandemics and the environmental destruction which threatens the future of our planet,” he said.

“Do not fear; put your trust in him! The life-giving power of his light is an incentive for building a new world order based on just, ethical and economic relationships,” he said.

Marching bands of the Swiss Guard and Italian police played for the crowd near a larger-than-life nativity scene, making for a festive atmosphere despite the rain.

The address by the leader of the world’s 1.1 billion Roman Catholics was different in style than those of his predecessor John Paul, who died in April.

John Paul wrote his Christmas addresses in free-style verse and resembled poetry, whereas Benedict’s was in prose.

After the address, Pope Benedict wished the world a Happy Christmas in 33 languages, including Arabic, Hebrew, Swahili, Japanese and Latin. His predecessor sometimes used twice as many languages on Christmas.

Since his election, the pope has repeatedly reminded Catholics not to give in to an ‘ethical relativism’ where circumstances can be used to justify actions that should be considered wrong in all cases.—Reuters